A journal of IEEE and CAA , publishes high-quality papers in English on original theoretical/experimental research and development in all areas of automation

IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica

  • JCR Impact Factor: 15.3, Top 1 (SCI Q1)
    CiteScore: 23.5, Top 2% (Q1)
    Google Scholar h5-index: 77, TOP 5
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
X. Ma, T. Chen, and Y. Wang, “Dynamic process monitoring based on dot product feature analysis for thermal power plants,” IEEE/CAA J. Autom. Sinica, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 1–12, Feb. 2025.
Citation: X. Ma, T. Chen, and Y. Wang, “Dynamic process monitoring based on dot product feature analysis for thermal power plants,” IEEE/CAA J. Autom. Sinica, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 1–12, Feb. 2025.

Dynamic Process Monitoring Based on Dot Product Feature Analysis for Thermal Power Plants

Funds:  This work was supported in part by the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of China (62225303), the National Natural Science Fundation of China (62303039, 62433004), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (BX20230034, 2023M730190), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (buctrc202201, QNTD2023-01), and the High Performance Computing Platform, College of Information Science and Technology, Beijing University of Chemical Technology
More Information
  • Data-driven process monitoring is an effective approach to assure safe operation of modern manufacturing and energy systems, such as thermal power plants being studied in this work. Industrial processes are inherently dynamic and need to be monitored using dynamic algorithms. Mainstream dynamic algorithms rely on concatenating current measurement with past data. This work proposes a new, alternative dynamic process monitoring algorithm, using dot product feature analysis (DPFA). DPFA computes the dot product of consecutive samples, thus naturally capturing the process dynamics through temporal correlation. At the same time, DPFA’s online computational complexity is lower than not just existing dynamic algorithms, but also classical static algorithms (e.g. principal component analysis and slow feature analysis). The detectability of the new algorithm is analyzed for three types of faults typically seen in process systems: sensor bias, process fault and gain change fault. Through experiments with a numerical example and real data from a thermal power plant, the DPFA algorithm is shown to be superior to the state-of-the-art methods, in terms of better monitoring performance (fault detection rate and false alarm rate) and lower computational complexity.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    L. Wen, L. Gao, and X. Li, “A new deep transfer learning based on sparse auto-encoder for fault diagnosis,” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern.: Syst., vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 136–144, Jan. 2019. doi: 10.1109/TSMC.2017.2754287
    [2]
    W. G. Fenton, T. M. McGinnity, and L. P. Maguire, “Fault diagnosis of electronic systems using intelligent techniques: A review,” IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern., Part C (Appl. Rev.), vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 269–281, Aug. 2001. doi: 10.1109/5326.971655
    [3]
    D. Wu, D. Zhou, M. Chen, J. Zhu, F. Yan, S. Zheng, and E. Guo, “Output-relevant common trend analysis for KPI-related nonstationary process monitoring with applications to thermal power plants,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Informat., vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 6664–6675, Oct. 2021. doi: 10.1109/TII.2020.3041516
    [4]
    B. Pattipati, C. Sankavaram, and K. Pattipati, “System identification and estimation framework for pivotal automotive battery management system characteristics,” IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern., Part C (Appl. Rev.), vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 869–884, Nov. 2011.
    [5]
    Z. Huang, Z. Wang, and H. Zhang, “Multilevel feature moving average ratio method for fault diagnosis of the microgrid inverter switch,” IEEE/CAA J. Autom. Sinica, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 177–185, Apr. 2017. doi: 10.1109/JAS.2017.7510496
    [6]
    E. Principi, D. Rossetti, S. Squartini, and F. Piazza, “Unsupervised electric motor fault detection by using deep autoencoders,” IEEE/CAA J. Autom. Sinica, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 441–451, Mar. 2019. doi: 10.1109/JAS.2019.1911393
    [7]
    Y. Wang, Y. Si, B. Huang, and Z. Lou, “Survey on the theoretical research and engineering applications of multivariate statistics process monitoring algorithms: 2008-2017,” Can. J. Chem. Eng., vol. 96, no. 10, pp. 2073–2085, Oct. 2018. doi: 10.1002/cjce.23249
    [8]
    B. Pourbabaee, M. J. Roshtkhari, and K. Khorasani, “Deep convolutional neural networks and learning ECG features for screening paroxysmal atrial fibrillation patients,” IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern.: Syst., vol. 48, no. 12, pp. 2095–2104, Dec. 2018. doi: 10.1109/TSMC.2017.2705582
    [9]
    Y. Jiang and S. Yin, “Recent advances in key-performance-indicator oriented prognosis and diagnosis with a MATLAB toolbox: DB-KIT,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Informat., vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 2849–2858, May 2019.
    [10]
    X. Wang, X. Liu, and Y. Li, “An incremental model transfer method for complex process fault diagnosis,” IEEE/CAA J. Autom. Sinica, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 1268–1280, Sept. 2019. doi: 10.1109/JAS.2019.1911618
    [11]
    H. Chen, B. Jiang, N. Lu, and Z. Mao, “Deep PCA based real-time incipient fault detection and diagnosis methodology for electrical drive in high-speed trains,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 4819–4830, Jun. 2018.
    [12]
    J. Zhang, D. Zhou, and M. Chen, “Adaptive cointegration analysis and modified RPCA with continual learning ability for monitoring multimode nonstationary processes,” IEEE Trans. Cybern., vol. 53, no. 8, pp. 4841–4854, Aug. 2023. doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2021.3140065
    [13]
    H. Su and G. Zheng, “A partial least squares regression-based fusion model for predicting the trend in drowsiness,” IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern.——Part A: Syst. Humans, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 1085–1092, Sept. 2008. doi: 10.1109/TSMCA.2008.2001067
    [14]
    C. Shang, B. Huang, F. Yang, and D. Huang, “Slow feature analysis for monitoring and diagnosis of control performance,” J. Process Control, vol. 39, pp. 21–34, Mar. 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2015.12.004
    [15]
    Z. Lou, Y. Wang, Y. Si, and S. Lu, “A novel multivariate statistical process monitoring algorithm: Orthonormal subspace analysis,” Automatica, vol. 138, p. 110148, Apr. 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2021.110148
    [16]
    Q. Chen, Z. Liu, X. Ma, and Y. Wang, “Artificial neural correlation analysis for performance-indicator-related nonlinear process monitoring,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Informat., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 1039–1049, Feb. 2022.
    [17]
    J. Shang, M. Chen, H. Ji, and D. Zhou, “Recursive transformed component statistical analysis for incipient fault detection,” Automatica, vol. 80, pp. 313–327, Jun. 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2017.02.028
    [18]
    Y. Qin, Y. Yan, H. Ji, and Y. Wang, “Recursive correlative statistical analysis method with sliding windows for incipient fault detection,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 4185–4194, Apr. 2022. doi: 10.1109/TIE.2021.3070521
    [19]
    Y. Wang, T. Hou, M. Cui, and X. Ma, “Orthogonal stationary component analysis for nonstationary process monitoring,” IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 72, p. 3527309, Aug. 2023.
    [20]
    C.-Y. Zhang, Z.-L. Yao, H.-Y. Yao, F. Huang, and C. L. P. Chen, “Dynamic representation learning via recurrent graph neural networks,” IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern.: Syst., vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 1284–1297, Feb. 2023.
    [21]
    W. Ku, R. H. Storer, and C. Georgakis, “Disturbance detection and isolation by dynamic principal component analysis,” Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 179–196, Nov. 1995. doi: 10.1016/0169-7439(95)00076-3
    [22]
    Z. Lou, D. Shen, and Y. Wang, “Two-step principal component analysis for dynamic processes monitoring,” Can. J. Chem. Eng., vol. 96, no. 1, pp. 160–170, Jan. 2018. doi: 10.1002/cjce.22855
    [23]
    C. Shang, B. Huang, and D. Huang, “A systematic approach to dynamic monitoring of industrial processes based on second-order slow feature analysis,” IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 51, no. 18, pp. 387–392, Oct. 2018.
    [24]
    J. Zheng, C. Zhao, and F. Gao, “Retrospective comparison of several typical linear dynamic latent variable models for industrial process monitoring,” Comput. Chem. Eng., vol. 157, p. 107587, Jan. 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2021.107587
    [25]
    X. Ma, Y. Si, Z. Yuan, Y. Qin, and Y. Wang, “Multistep dynamic slow feature analysis for industrial process monitoring,” IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 69, no. 12, pp. 9535–9548, Dec. 2020.
    [26]
    X. Ma, Y. Si, Y. Qin, and Y. Wang, “Fault detection for dynamic processes based on recursive innovational component statistical analysis,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 310–319, Jan. 2023. doi: 10.1109/TASE.2022.3149591
    [27]
    J. Shang and M. Chen, “Recursive dynamic transformed component statistical analysis for fault detection in dynamic processes,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 578–588, Jan. 2018. doi: 10.1109/TIE.2017.2721929
    [28]
    Y. Dong, S. J. Qin, “A novel dynamic PCA algorithm for dynamic data modeling and process monitoring,” J. Process Control, vol. 67, pp. 1–11, Jul. 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.jprocont.2017.05.002
    [29]
    W. Yu, C. Zhao, and B. Huang, “Recursive cointegration analytics for adaptive monitoring of nonstationary industrial processes with both static and dynamic variations,” J. Process Control, vol. 92, pp. 319–332, Aug. 2020.
    [30]
    D. Zhou, Y. Zhao, Z. Wang, X. He, and M. Gao, “Review on diagnosis techniques for intermittent faults in dynamic systems,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 2337–2347, Mar. 2020. doi: 10.1109/TIE.2019.2907500
    [31]
    J. Yu, L. Ye, L. Zhou, Z. Yang, F. Shen, and Z. Song, “Dynamic process monitoring based on variational Bayesian canonical variate analysis,” IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern.: Syst., vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 2412–2422, Apr. 2022. doi: 10.1109/TSMC.2021.3051054
    [32]
    C. Zhao and H. Sun, “Dynamic distributed monitoring strategy for large-scale nonstationary processes subject to frequently varying conditions under closed-loop control,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 66, no. 6, pp. 4749–4758, Jun. 2019. doi: 10.1109/TIE.2018.2864703
    [33]
    G. H. Golub and C. F. Van Loan, Matrix Computations. 4th ed. Baltimore, USA: JHU Press, 2012.
    [34]
    H. Ji, “Statistics Mahalanobis distance for incipient sensor fault detection and diagnosis,” Chem. Eng. Sci., vol. 230, p. 116223, Feb. 2021.
    [35]
    L. Feng and C. Zhao, “Fault description based attribute transfer for zero-sample industrial fault diagnosis,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Informat., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 1852–1862, Mar. 2021. doi: 10.1109/TII.2020.2988208

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(5)  / Tables(5)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (3) PDF downloads(1) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return