Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/HTML-CSS/jax.js
A journal of IEEE and CAA , publishes high-quality papers in English on original theoretical/experimental research and development in all areas of automation
Volume 6 Issue 3
May  2019

IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica

  • JCR Impact Factor: 15.3, Top 1 (SCI Q1)
    CiteScore: 23.5, Top 2% (Q1)
    Google Scholar h5-index: 77, TOP 5
Hossein Aminikhah, Amir Hosein Refahi Sheikhani, Tahereh Houlari and Hadi Rezazadeh, "Numerical Solution of the Distributed-Order Fractional Bagley-Torvik Equation," IEEE/CAA J. Autom. Sinica, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 760-765, May 2019. doi: 10.1109/JAS.2017.7510646
Citation: Hossein Aminikhah, Amir Hosein Refahi Sheikhani, Tahereh Houlari and Hadi Rezazadeh, "Numerical Solution of the Distributed-Order Fractional Bagley-Torvik Equation," IEEE/CAA J. Autom. Sinica, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 760-765, May 2019. doi: 10.1109/JAS.2017.7510646

Numerical Solution of the Distributed-Order Fractional Bagley-Torvik Equation

doi: 10.1109/JAS.2017.7510646
More Information
  • In this paper, two numerical methods are proposed for solving distributed-order fractional Bagley-Torvik equation. This equation is used in modeling the motion of a rigid plate immersed in a Newtonian fluid with respect to the nonnegative density function. Using the composite Boole's rule the distributed-order Bagley-Torvik equation is approximated by a multi-term time-fractional equation, which is then solved by the Grunwald-Letnikov method (GLM) and the fractional differential transform method (FDTM). Finally, we compared our results with the exact results of some cases and show the excellent agreement between the approximate result and the exact solution.

     

  • The fractional order calculus establishes the branch of mathematics dealing with differentiation and integration under an arbitrary order of the operation, that is the order can be any real or even complex number, not only the integer one. Although the history of fractional calculus is more than three centuries old, it only has received much attention and interest in the past 20 years; the reader may refer to [1], [2] for the theory and applications of fractional calculus. The generalization of dynamical equations using fractional derivatives proved to be useful and more accurate in mathematical modeling related to many interdisciplinary areas. Applications of fractional order differential equations include: electrochemistry [3], porous media [4] etc.

    The fractional differential operator of distributed order

    Dw(α)tf(t)=γ2γ1w(α)Dαtf(t)dα,w(α)0 (1)

    is a generalization of the single order Dα=dαdtα(α[γ1,γ2]) which by considering a continuous or discrete distribution of fractional derivative is obtained. In fact, one can find that the time distributed-order differential equation is a continuous generalization of the single-order time-fractional one and the multi-term time-fractional in time. If the nonnegative density function in the distributed integral takes the single Dirac-δ function, the distributed-order time-differential equation is reduced to the single-order one. And if the linear combination of several Dirac-δ functions is taken as the nonnegative density function, then the multi-term one is recovered. The idea of fractional derivative of distributed order is stated by Caputo [5] and later developed by Caputo himself [6], Bagley and Torvik [7], [8]. Other researchers used this idea, and interesting reviews appeared to describe the related mathematical models of fractional differential equation of distributed order. For example, distributed-order differential equations have been used in [9] to model the stress-strain behavior of an anelastic medium and in [5] to find the eigenfunctions of the torsional models of anelastic or dielectric spherical shells and infinite plates; in [10] further dielectric models and diffusion equations lead to distributed-order differential equations. In [7], [8] distributed-order differential equations provide models of the input-output relationship of a linear time-variant system based on frequency domain observations. Furthermore, the stability analysis of distributed order fractional differential equations with respect to the nonnegative density function was studied in [11], [12].

    The numerical methods of the distributed-order equations have been a main goal in researches. Hence, there are some papers discussing numerical methods of the distributed-order equations. For example, Diethelm et al. [13], and Katsikadelis [14] introduced effective numerical methods for solving linear and nonlinear distributed-order ordinary differential equations.

    In this paper two numerical methods are presented for solving distributed-order Bagley-Torvik equation of the form [15]:

    ay(t)+bcDw(α)ty(t)+cy(t)=f(t) (2)

    where cDw(α)ty(t)=r0w(α)cDαty(t)dα (r=1or2), with initial conditions

    y(0)=υ1,y(0)=υ2 (3)

    where a,b,c,υ1 and υ2 are constant coefficients and the function f(x) is continuous. In particular, if w(α)=δ(α1/2) or w(α)=δ(α3/2), then (2) can model the frequency-dependent damping materials quite satisfactorily. It can also describe motion of real physical systems, the modeling of the motion of a rigid plate immersed in a Newtonian fluid and a gas in a fluid, respectively [16], [17]. Since the distributed-order operator in (2) is represented by an integral of weighted constant-order operator, thus, the recipe for the distributed-order Bagley-Torvik equation consist of two steps. Firstly, we transform the distributed-order equation into a multi-term time-fractional differential equation by applying the composite Boole's rule [18]. Then we apply the Grunwald-Letnikov method (GLM) [19] and the fractional differential transform method (FDTM) [20], to approximate the multi-term time-fractional differential equation. Finally, we compare the results obtained using the Grunwald-Letnikov method and the fractional differential transform method, with the exact solution for some cases to show the effectiveness of our methods.

    In this section, we consider the main definitions of fractional derivative operators of single and distributed order.

    The Riemann-Liouville definition is given as

    RLaDαty(t)=1Γ(mα)dmdtmta(tτ)mα1y(τ)dτ (4)

    where m is the first integer which is not less than α, i.e., m1<αm and Γ(.) is a Gamma function.

    The Grunwald-Letnikov definition is given by

    GLaDαty(t)=limh0hα[tah]i=0(1)i(αi)y(tjh) (5)

    where [] means the integer part.

    Because the Grunwald-Letnikov's definition is the most straightforward from the viewpoint of numerical implementation so we will use it for solving fractional differential equations. The approximate Grunwald-Letnikov's definition is given below, where the step size of h is assumed to be very small [21], [22],

    caDαtky(t)hαki=0c(α)iy(tki) (6)

    where tk=kh (k=1,,tah) and c(α)i (i=0,1,,k) are binomial coefficients, which can be computed as [22]

    c(α)0=1,c(α)i=(11+αi)c(α)i1. (7)

    Finally, the Caputo fractional derivative of y(t) is defined as

    CaDαty(t)=1Γ(mα)ta(tτ)mα1y(m)(τ)dτ (8)

    for m1<αm, mN. The Caputo's definition has the advantage of dealing properly with initial value problems in which the initial conditions are given in terms of the field variables and their integer order which is the case in most physical processes.

    Now, we generalize the above definition of the fractional derivative of distributed-order in the Caputo sense with respect to order-density function w(α) as follows

    cDw(α)ty(t)=βνw(α)cDαty(t)dα (9)

    where c0Dαt=cDαt. With out restricting the generality, the solution procedure is presented for 0ν<β2.

    In this section, we introduce the composite Boole's rule, the Grunwald-Letnikov method and the fractional differential transform method to obtain approximate solutions of the distributed-order Bagley-Torvik equation.

    Here we demonstrate composite Boole's rule to discretize the distribution integral in (2). Suppose that the interval [0,r] is subdivided into 4n subintervals [αk,αk+1] of width H=r/4n by using the equally spaced nodes αk=α0+kH, for k=0,1,,4n. Approximating the integral term in (2) using the composite Boole's rule with 4n equal subintervals, we obtain

    cDw(α)ty(t)=r0w(α)cDαty(t)dα2H45nk=17w(α4k4)cDα4k4ty(t)+32w(α4k3)cDα4k3ty(t)+12w(α4k2)cDα4k2ty(t)+32w(α4k1)cDα4k1ty(t)+7w(α4k)cDα4kty(t)) (10)

    with cDα0ty(t)=y(t) and cDα4nty(t)=cDrty(t).

    Hence, (2) may be approximated via

    ay(t)+2bH45nk=1(7w(α4k4)cDα4k4ty(t)+32w(α4k3)cDα4k3ty(t)+12w(α4k2)cDα4k2ty(t)+32w(α4k1)cDα4k1ty(t)+7w(α4k)cDα4kty(t))+cy(t)=f(t) (11)

    with initial conditions

    y(0)=υ1,y(0)=υ2. (12)

    Remark 1: When we approximate the integral in the distributed-order equation by a finite sum then the error for the composite Boole's rule is of the order O(H6) [18].

    In 2004, Diethelm and Ford [23] introduced the first scheme for the solution of multi-order fractional differential equations of the form (11). They converted equations with commensurate multiple fractional derivatives into a very simple linear system of fractional differential equations of low order and then the application of any single-term equation solver solves the problem.

    Let M be the least common multiple of the denominators of α1,α2,,α4n, and set γ=1/M and N=2M. We have the following theorem on equivalence of a nonlinear system

    Theorem 1 [23]: Equation (11), equipped with the initial conditions (12), is equivalent to the system of equations

    cDγty0(t)=y1(t)cDγty1(t)=y2(t)cDγty2(t)=y3(t)cDγtyN2(t)=yN1(t)cDγtyN1(t)=f(t)g(y0(t),,yN1(t)) (13)

    together with the initial conditions

    y0(0)=υ1,yM(0)=υ2 (14)

    in the following sense:

    1) Whenever Y=(y0,,yN1)T with y0C2[0,b] for some b>0 is the solution of the system (13), equipped with the corresponding initial conditions, the function y=y0 solves the multi-order (11), and it satisfies the initial conditions (12).

    2) Whenever y0C2[0,b] is a solution of the multi-order (11) satisfying the initial conditions (12), the vector-valued function

    Y=(y0,,yN1)T=(y0,cDγty,cD2γty,,cD(N1)γty)T

    satisfies the system (13) and the initial conditions (14).

    Remark 2: If w(α)=nj=1cjδ(αjγ), (0<nγ1 or2), then the distributed-order Bagley-Torvik (2) converts to multi-order time-fractional differential equation, therefore the first step is not required.

    Now, numerical method to solving the system (13) and the initial conditions (14) is presented, which is based on the Grunwald-Letnikov's approximation described in [19].

    Suppose P is integer numbers so that T=hP. We use a uniform grid

    {tk=kh:k=0,1,,P}. (15)

    Let ˜y(tk) denote the approximation to y(tk) and also we have already calculated approximation ˜y(tk)y(tk), (k=0,1,,n1P). Therefore, a general numerical solution of the system (13) and the initial conditions (14) can be expressed by using the relations (6) and (7) as

    {˜y0(tn)=˜y1(tn1)hγnk=1c(γ)k˜y0(tnk)˜y1(tn)=˜y2(tn1)hγnk=1c(γ)k˜y1(tnk)˜y2(tn)=˜y3(tn1)hγnk=1c(γ)k˜y2(tnk)˜yN2(tn)=˜yN1(tn1)hγnk=1c(γ)k˜yN2(tnk)˜yN1(tn)=(f(t)g(˜y0(tn),,˜yN1(tn)))hγnk=1c(γ)k˜yN1(tnk) (16)

    subject to initial conditions

    ˜y0(0)=υ1,˜yM(0)=υ2. (17)

    In [19], the consistence, convergence and stability of the numerical method mentioned above are studied.

    Remark 3: The error associated with the approximation of a multi-term equation using the Grunwald-Letnikov method, is of the order O(h(1+γ)).

    The fractional differential transform method is applied to solve fractional differential equations. For applying this method, one should be familiar with the basic idea of the fractional differential transform method. Let us expand the analytical and continuous function f(t) in terms of a fractional power series as follows

    f(t)=k=0F(k)(tt0)kα (18)

    where α is the order of fraction and F(k) is the fractional differential transform of f(t).

    In order to avoid fractional initial and boundary conditions, we define the fractional derivative in the Caputo sense. The relation between the Riemann-Liouville operator and Caputo operator is given by

    ct0Dqtf(t)=1Γ(mq)dmdtmtt0f(τ)(tτ)1+qmdτm1k=01k!(tt0)kf(k)(t0)

    where m1<qm and t>t0.

    For the sake of simplicity of the following transformation the initial condition will be implemented to the integer order derivatives

    F(k)={1(kα)![dkαf(t)dtkα]t=t0,if kαZ+0,if kαZ+

    for k=0,1,2,,(qα1), where q is the order of fractional differential equation considered.

    Using (4) and (18), the following theorems of fractional differential transform method are given below. A complete discussion on the proofs of these theorems can be found in [20], [21].

    Theorem 2: If f(t)=g(t)±h(t), then F(k)=G(k)±H(k).

    Theorem 3: If f(t)=g(t)h(t), then F(k)=kl=0G(l)×\\ H(kl).

    Theorem 4: If f(t)=g1(t)g2(x)gn1(t)gn(t), then

    F(k)=kkn1=0kn1kn2=0k3k2=0k2k1=0        (G1(k1)G2(k2k1)Gn(knkn1)).

    Theorem 5: If f(t)=(tt0)p, then F(k)=δ(kαp), where

    δ(k)={1,if k=00,if k0.

    Theorem 6: If f(t)=Dqt0[g(t)], then

    F(k)=Γ(1+q+kα)Γ(1+kα)G(k+αq). (19)

    Now assume that q=γ and α=M, thus, according to fractional differential transform method, by taking differential transform on both sides of the system (13) and the initial conditions (14) are transformed as follows

    Y0(k+1)=Γ(k+MM)Γ(k+M+1M)Y1(k)Y1(k+1)=Γ(k+MM)Γ(k+M+1M)Y2(k)Y3(k+1)=Γ(k+MM)Γ(k+M+1M)Y4(k)YN2(k+1)=Γ(k+MM)Γ(k+M+1M)YN1(k)YN1(k+1)=Γ(k+MM)Γ(k+M+1M)(F(k)G(k)) (20)

    subject to initial conditions

    Y0(0)=υ1,Y1(0)=0,,YM1(0)=0YM(0)=υ2,YM+1(0)=0,,YN2(0)=0YN1(0)=0. (21)

    Therefore, according to differential transform method the K-term approximations for (13) can be expressed as

    y(t)y0(t)=Ki=1Y0tiM. (22)

    In this section, we present some examples to illustrate the efficiency of the methods. In the following, five different cases of the weighting function of order are discussed respectively.

    Case 1: cDw(α)ty(t)=10δ(α12)cDαty(t)dα and a=b=c=1, with the initial conditions

    y(0)=0,y(0)=0

    where

    f(t)=t3+6t+3.2t2.5Γ(0.5)

    and the exact solution is y(t)=t3. The obtained numerical result by means of the proposed FDTM solution, GLM solution and exact solution are shown in Fig. 1, with the final time T=10, K=8 and h=0.01 when w(α) be Case 1.

    Figure  1.  Comparison between the exact solution, FDTM solution and the GL solution of (2) for T=10, K=8 and h=0.01 when w(α) be Case 1.

    Case 2: cDw(α)ty(t)=20δ(α32)cDαty(t)dα and a=b=c=1, with the initial conditions

    y(0)=0,y(0)=0

    where

    f(t)=t2+2+4t0.5Γ(0.5)

    and the exact solution is y(t)=t2. Fig. 2 presents a comparison of the numerical solutions FDTM, GLM and the exact solution by step size h=0.01, K=8 and T=10 when w(α) be Case 2.

    Figure  2.  Comparison between the exact solution, FDTM solution and the GLM solution of equation (2) for T=10, K=8 and h=0.01 when w(α) be Case 2.

    Case 3: cDw(α)ty(t)=20δ(α32)+δ(α1)+δ(α12) cDαty(t)dα and a=b=c=1, with the initial conditions

    y(0)=0,y(0)=0

    where

    f(t)=t3+3t2+6t+8t1.5Γ(0.5)+3.2t2.5Γ(0.5)

    and the exact solution is y(t)=t3. Comparison of numerical results with the exact solution is shown in Fig. 3 by step size h=0.01, K=8 and T=10 when w(α) be Case 3.

    Figure  3.  Comparison between the exact solution, FDTM solution and the GLM solution of (2) for T=10, K=8 and h=0.01 when w(α) be Case 3.

    Case 4: cDw(α)ty(t)=106α(1α)cDαty(t)dα and a=1,b=0.5,c=1.5, with the initial conditions

    y(0)=0,y(0)=0

    where

    f(t)=8.

    We show the numerical solutions in Fig. 4 with step size h=0.01, H=0.25, T=10 and K=T/h when w(α) be Case 4.

    Figure  4.  GLM solution and FDTM solution of the distributed-order equation (2) for T=10, h=0.01, H=0.25 and K=T/h when w(α) be Case 4.

    Case 5: cDw(α)ty(t)=10Γ(4α)cDαty(t)dα and a=1,b=2,c=0.5, with the initial conditions

    y(0)=0,y(0)=1

    where

    f(t)=3t3+2.

    We show the numerical solutions in Fig. 5 with step size h=0.01, H=0.25, T=10 and K=T/h when w(α) be Case 4.

    Figure  5.  GLM solution and FDTM solution of the distributed-order (2) for T=10, h=0.01, H=0.25 and K=T/h when w(α) be Case 5.

    In this paper, two schemes for the distributed-order Bagley-Torvik equation with respect to the nonnegative density function have been described. First, by approximating the integral term in the distributed-order equation using the composite Boole's rule, we obtained a multi-term time-fractional equation. Afterwards, the multi-term time-fractional differential equation is solved by the Grunwald-Letnikov method and the fractional differential transform method. Eventually, five examples of distributed-order Bagley-Torvik equation are presented to illustrate the efficiency and reliability of the methods. All numerical results are obtained using MATLAB 7.11.

  • [1]
    A. A. Kilbas, H. M. Srivastava, and J. J. Trujillo, Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Limited, 2006.
    [2]
    I. Podlubny, Fractional Differential Equations. San Diego: Academic Press, 1999.
    [3]
    E. Reyes-Melo, J. Martinez-Vega, C. Guerrero-Salazar, and U. Ortiz-Mendez, "Application of fractional calculus to the modeling of dielectric relaxation phenomena in polymeric materials, " J. Appl. Polym. Sci., vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 923-935, Oct. 2005. doi: 10.1002/app.22057/full
    [4]
    R. Schumer, D. A. Benson, M. M. Meerschaert, and S. W. Wheatcraft, "Eulerian derivation of the fractional advection-dispersion equation, " J. Contam. Hydrol., vol. 48, no. 1-2, pp. 69-88, Mar. 2001. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169772200001704
    [5]
    M. Caputo, Elasticità e dissipazione. Bologna: Zanichelli, 1969.
    [6]
    M. Caputo, "Mean fractional-order-derivatives differential equations and filters, " Annali delloUniversità di Ferrara, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 73-84, Jan. 1995.
    [7]
    R. L. Bagley and P. J. Torvik, "On the existence of the order domain and the solution of distributed order equations-Part Ⅰ, " Int. J. Appl. Math., vol. 2, no. 7, pp. 865-882, Jan. 2000. http://www.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=1758200
    [8]
    R. L. Bagley and P. J. Torvik, "On the existence of the order domain and the solution of distributed order equations-Part Ⅱ, " Int. J. Appl. Math., vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 965-988, Jan. 2000. http://www.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=1758200
    [9]
    M. Caputo, "Linear models of dissipation whose Q is almost frequency independent-Ⅱ, " Geophys. J. Int., vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 529-539, May 1967.
    [10]
    M. Caputo, "Distributed order differential equations modelling dielectric induction and diffusion, " Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 421-442, Jan. 2001. http://www.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=1874477
    [11]
    H. S. Najafi, A. Refahi Sheikhani, and A. Ansari, "Stability analysis of distributed order fractional differential equations, " Abstr. Appl. Anal., vol. 2011, Article ID 175323, Jul. 2011.
    [12]
    H. Aminikhah, A. Refahi Sheikhani, and H. Rezazadeh, "Stability analysis of distributed order fractional Chen system, " Scient. World J., vol. 2013, Article ID 645080, Oct. 2013. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24489508
    [13]
    K. Diethelm, and N. J. Ford, "Numerical analysis for distributed-order differential equations, " J. Comput. Appl. Math., vol. 225, no. 1, pp. 96-104, Mar. 2009. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377042708003464
    [14]
    J. T. Katsikadelis, "Numerical solution of distributed order fractional differential equations, " J. Comput. Phys., vol. 259, pp. 11-22, Feb. 2014. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021999113007754
    [15]
    Z. Jiao, Y. Q. Chen, and I. Podlubny, Distributed-Order Dynamic Systems: Stability, Simulation, Applications and Perspectives. London: Springer, 2012.
    [16]
    P. J. Torvik and R. L. Bagley, "On the appearance of the fractional derivative in the behavior of real materials, " J. Appl. Mech., vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 294-298, Jun. 1984. http://openurl.ebscohost.com/linksvc/linking.aspx?stitle=Journal%20of%20Applied%20Mechanics&volume=51&issue=2&spage=725
    [17]
    R. L. Bagley and J. Torvik, "Fractional calculus-a different approach to the analysis of viscoelastically damped structures, " AIAA J., vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 741-748, May 1983.
    [18]
    G. Boole, A Treatise on the Calculus of Finite Differences. London: MacMillan and Company, 1880.
    [19]
    X. Cai and F. Liu, "Numerical simulation of the fractional-order control system, " J. Appl. Math. Comput., vol. 23, no. 1-2, pp. 229-241, Jan. 2007. doi: 10.1007/BF02831971
    [20]
    A. Arikoglu and I. Ozkol, "Solution of fractional differential equations by using differential transform method, " Chaos Soliton. Fract., vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 1473-1481, Dec. 2007.
    [21]
    Z. Odibat, M. Momani, and V. S. Ertuk, "Generalized differential transform method: application to differential equations of fractional order, " Appl. Math. Comput., vol. 197, no. 2, pp. 467-477, Apr. 2008.
    [22]
    I. Petras, Fractional-order Nonlinear Systems: Modeling, Analysis and Simulation. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2011.
    [23]
    K. Diethelm and N. J. Ford, "Multi-order fractional differential equations and their numerical solution, " Appl. Math. Comput., vol. 154, no. 3, pp. 621-640, Jul. 2004. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0096300303007392
  • Related Articles

    [1]Shaobo He, Kehui Sun, Huihai Wang. Dynamics of the Fractional-Order Lorenz System Based on Adomian Decomposition Method and Its DSP Implementation[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2024, 11(5): 1298-1300. doi: 10.1109/JAS.2016.7510133
    [2]Dingxin He, HaoPing Wang, Yang Tian, Yida Guo. A Fractional-Order Ultra-Local Model-Based Adaptive Neural Network Sliding Mode Control of n-DOF Upper-Limb Exoskeleton With Input Deadzone[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2024, 11(3): 760-781. doi: 10.1109/JAS.2023.123882
    [3]Zhe Gao. Stable Model Order Reduction Method for Fractional-Order Systems Based on Unsymmetric Lanczos Algorithm[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2019, 6(2): 485-492. doi: 10.1109/JAS.2019.1911399
    [4]Hossein Aminikhah, Mahdieh Tahmasebi, Mahmoud Mohammadi Roozbahani. The Multi-scale Method for Solving Nonlinear Time Space Fractional Partial Differential Equations[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2019, 6(1): 299-306. doi: 10.1109/JAS.2016.7510058
    [5]Lifeng Wu, Sifeng Liu, Yingjie Yang. Using the Fractional Order Method to Generalize Strengthening Buffer Operator and Weakening Buffer Operator[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2018, 5(6): 1074-1078. doi: 10.1109/JAS.2016.7510214
    [6]Ahmet Bekir, Ozkan Guner, Adem Cevikel. The Exp-function Method for Some Time-fractional Differential Equations[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2017, 4(2): 315-321. doi: 10.1109/JAS.2016.7510172
    [7]Sathiyaraj T., Balasubramaniam P.. Controllability of Fractional Order Stochastic Differential Inclusions with Fractional Brownian Motion in Finite Dimensional Space[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2016, 3(4): 400-410.
    [8]Norelys Aguila-Camacho, Manuel A. Duarte-Mermoud. Improving the Control Energy in Model Reference Adaptive Controllers Using Fractional Adaptive Laws[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2016, 3(3): 332-337.
    [9]Yan Ma, Xiuwen Zhou, Bingsi Li, Hong Chen. Fractional Modeling and SOC Estimation of Lithium-ion Battery[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2016, 3(3): 281-287.
    [10]Bingsan Chen, Chunyu Li, Benjamin Wilson, Yijian Huang. Fractional Modeling and Analysis of Coupled MR Damping System[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2016, 3(3): 288-294.
    [11]Kecai Cao, YangQuan Chen, Daniel Stuart. A Fractional Micro-Macro Model for Crowds of Pedestrians Based on Fractional Mean Field Games[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2016, 3(3): 261-270.
    [12]Kai Chen, Junguo Lu, Chuang Li. The Ellipsoidal Invariant Set of Fractional Order Systems Subject to Actuator Saturation: The Convex Combination Form[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2016, 3(3): 311-319.
    [13]Cuihong Wang, Huanhuan Li, YangQuan Chen. H Output Feedback Control of Linear Time-invariant Fractional-order Systems over Finite Frequency Range[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2016, 3(3): 304-310.
    [14]Zeeshan Alam, Liguo Yuan, Qigui Yang. Chaos and Combination Synchronization of a New Fractional-order System with Two Stable Node-foci[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2016, 3(2): 157-164.
    [15]Xiaojuan Chen, Jun Zhang, Tiedong Ma. Parameter Estimation and Topology Identification of Uncertain General Fractional-order Complex Dynamical Networks with Time Delay[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2016, 3(3): 295-303.
    [16]Mojtaba Naderi Soorki, Mohammad Saleh Tavazoei. Constrained Swarm Stabilization of Fractional Order Linear Time Invariant Swarm Systems[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2016, 3(3): 320-331.
    [17]YangQuan Chen, Dingyü Xue, Antonio Visioli. Guest Editorial for Special Issue on Fractional Order Systems and Controls[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2016, 3(3): 255-256.
    [18]Bruce J. West, Malgorzata Turalska. The Fractional Landau Model[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2016, 3(3): 257-260.
    [19]Jiacai Huang, YangQuan Chen, Haibin Li, Xinxin Shi. Fractional Order Modeling of Human Operator Behavior with Second Order Controlled Plant and Experiment Research[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2016, 3(3): 271-280.
    [20]Fudong Ge, YangQuan Chen, Chunhai Kou. Cyber-physical Systems as General Distributed Parameter Systems: Three Types of Fractional Order Models and Emerging Research Opportunities[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2015, 2(4): 353-357.

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(5)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1270) PDF downloads(39) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return