
IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica
Citation: | Chengdong Li, Li Wang, Guiqing Zhang, Huidong Wang and Fang Shang, "Functional-type Single-input-rule-modules Connected Neural Fuzzy System for Wind Speed Prediction," IEEE/CAA J. Autom. Sinica, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 751-762, Oct. 2017. doi: 10.1109/JAS.2017.7510640 |
The fractional order calculus establishes the branch of mathematics dealing with differentiation and integration under an arbitrary order of the operation, that is the order can be any real or even complex number, not only the integer one. Although the history of fractional calculus is more than three centuries old, it only has received much attention and interest in the past 20 years; the reader may refer to [1], [2] for the theory and applications of fractional calculus. The generalization of dynamical equations using fractional derivatives proved to be useful and more accurate in mathematical modeling related to many interdisciplinary areas. Applications of fractional order differential equations include: electrochemistry [3], porous media [4] etc.
The fractional differential operator of distributed order
Dw(α)tf(t)=∫γ2γ1w(α)Dαtf(t)dα,w(α)≥0 |
(1) |
is a generalization of the single order Dα=dαdtα(α∈[γ1,γ2]) which by considering a continuous or discrete distribution of fractional derivative is obtained. In fact, one can find that the time distributed-order differential equation is a continuous generalization of the single-order time-fractional one and the multi-term time-fractional in time. If the nonnegative density function in the distributed integral takes the single Dirac-δ function, the distributed-order time-differential equation is reduced to the single-order one. And if the linear combination of several Dirac-δ functions is taken as the nonnegative density function, then the multi-term one is recovered. The idea of fractional derivative of distributed order is stated by Caputo [5] and later developed by Caputo himself [6], Bagley and Torvik [7], [8]. Other researchers used this idea, and interesting reviews appeared to describe the related mathematical models of fractional differential equation of distributed order. For example, distributed-order differential equations have been used in [9] to model the stress-strain behavior of an anelastic medium and in [5] to find the eigenfunctions of the torsional models of anelastic or dielectric spherical shells and infinite plates; in [10] further dielectric models and diffusion equations lead to distributed-order differential equations. In [7], [8] distributed-order differential equations provide models of the input-output relationship of a linear time-variant system based on frequency domain observations. Furthermore, the stability analysis of distributed order fractional differential equations with respect to the nonnegative density function was studied in [11], [12].
The numerical methods of the distributed-order equations have been a main goal in researches. Hence, there are some papers discussing numerical methods of the distributed-order equations. For example, Diethelm et al. [13], and Katsikadelis [14] introduced effective numerical methods for solving linear and nonlinear distributed-order ordinary differential equations.
In this paper two numerical methods are presented for solving distributed-order Bagley-Torvik equation of the form [15]:
ay″(t)+bcDw(α)ty(t)+cy(t)=f(t) |
(2) |
where cDw(α)ty(t)=∫r0w(α)cDαty(t)dα (r=1or2), with initial conditions
y(0)=υ1,y′(0)=υ2 |
(3) |
where a,b,c,υ1 and υ2 are constant coefficients and the function f(x) is continuous. In particular, if w(α)=δ(α−1/2) or w(α)=δ(α−3/2), then (2) can model the frequency-dependent damping materials quite satisfactorily. It can also describe motion of real physical systems, the modeling of the motion of a rigid plate immersed in a Newtonian fluid and a gas in a fluid, respectively [16], [17]. Since the distributed-order operator in (2) is represented by an integral of weighted constant-order operator, thus, the recipe for the distributed-order Bagley-Torvik equation consist of two steps. Firstly, we transform the distributed-order equation into a multi-term time-fractional differential equation by applying the composite Boole's rule [18]. Then we apply the Grunwald-Letnikov method (GLM) [19] and the fractional differential transform method (FDTM) [20], to approximate the multi-term time-fractional differential equation. Finally, we compare the results obtained using the Grunwald-Letnikov method and the fractional differential transform method, with the exact solution for some cases to show the effectiveness of our methods.
In this section, we consider the main definitions of fractional derivative operators of single and distributed order.
The Riemann-Liouville definition is given as
RLaDαty(t)=1Γ(m−α)dmdtm∫ta(t−τ)m−α−1y(τ)dτ |
(4) |
where m is the first integer which is not less than α, i.e., m−1<α≤m and Γ(.) is a Gamma function.
The Grunwald-Letnikov definition is given by
GLaDαty(t)=limh→0h−α[t−ah]∑i=0(−1)i(αi)y(t−jh) |
(5) |
where [⋅] means the integer part.
Because the Grunwald-Letnikov's definition is the most straightforward from the viewpoint of numerical implementation so we will use it for solving fractional differential equations. The approximate Grunwald-Letnikov's definition is given below, where the step size of h is assumed to be very small [21], [22],
caDαtky(t)≈h−αk∑i=0c(α)iy(tk−i) |
(6) |
where tk=kh (k=1,…,t−ah) and c(α)i (i=0,1,…,k) are binomial coefficients, which can be computed as [22]
c(α)0=1,c(α)i=(1−1+αi)c(α)i−1. |
(7) |
Finally, the Caputo fractional derivative of y(t) is defined as
CaDαty(t)=1Γ(m−α)∫ta(t−τ)m−α−1y(m)(τ)dτ |
(8) |
for m−1<α≤m, m∈N. The Caputo's definition has the advantage of dealing properly with initial value problems in which the initial conditions are given in terms of the field variables and their integer order which is the case in most physical processes.
Now, we generalize the above definition of the fractional derivative of distributed-order in the Caputo sense with respect to order-density function w(α) as follows
cDw(α)ty(t)=∫βνw(α)cDαty(t)dα |
(9) |
where c0Dαt=cDαt. With out restricting the generality, the solution procedure is presented for 0≤ν<β≤2.
In this section, we introduce the composite Boole's rule, the Grunwald-Letnikov method and the fractional differential transform method to obtain approximate solutions of the distributed-order Bagley-Torvik equation.
Here we demonstrate composite Boole's rule to discretize the distribution integral in (2). Suppose that the interval [0,r] is subdivided into 4n subintervals [αk,αk+1] of width H=r/4n by using the equally spaced nodes αk=α0+kH, for k=0,1,…,4n. Approximating the integral term in (2) using the composite Boole's rule with 4n equal subintervals, we obtain
cDw(α)ty(t)=∫r0w(α)cDαty(t)dα≈2H45n∑k=17w(α4k−4)cDα4k−4ty(t)+32w(α4k−3)cDα4k−3ty(t)+12w(α4k−2)cDα4k−2ty(t)+32w(α4k−1)cDα4k−1ty(t)+7w(α4k)cDα4kty(t)) |
(10) |
with cDα0ty(t)=y(t) and cDα4nty(t)=cDrty(t).
Hence, (2) may be approximated via
ay″(t)+2bH45n∑k=1(7w(α4k−4)cDα4k−4ty(t)+32w(α4k−3)cDα4k−3ty(t)+12w(α4k−2)cDα4k−2ty(t)+32w(α4k−1)cDα4k−1ty(t)+7w(α4k)cDα4kty(t))+cy(t)=f(t) |
(11) |
with initial conditions
y(0)=υ1,y′(0)=υ2. |
(12) |
Remark 1: When we approximate the integral in the distributed-order equation by a finite sum then the error for the composite Boole's rule is of the order O(H6) [18].
In 2004, Diethelm and Ford [23] introduced the first scheme for the solution of multi-order fractional differential equations of the form (11). They converted equations with commensurate multiple fractional derivatives into a very simple linear system of fractional differential equations of low order and then the application of any single-term equation solver solves the problem.
Let M be the least common multiple of the denominators of α1,α2,…,α4n, and set γ=1/M and N=2M. We have the following theorem on equivalence of a nonlinear system
Theorem 1 [23]: Equation (11), equipped with the initial conditions (12), is equivalent to the system of equations
cDγty0(t)=y1(t)cDγty1(t)=y2(t)cDγty2(t)=y3(t)⋮cDγtyN−2(t)=yN−1(t)cDγtyN−1(t)=f(t)−g(y0(t),…,yN−1(t)) |
(13) |
together with the initial conditions
y0(0)=υ1,yM(0)=υ2 |
(14) |
in the following sense:
1) Whenever Y=(y0,…,yN−1)T with y0∈C2[0,b] for some b>0 is the solution of the system (13), equipped with the corresponding initial conditions, the function y=y0 solves the multi-order (11), and it satisfies the initial conditions (12).
2) Whenever y0∈C2[0,b] is a solution of the multi-order (11) satisfying the initial conditions (12), the vector-valued function
Y=(y0,…,yN−1)T=(y0,cDγty,cD2γty,…,cD(N−1)γty)T |
satisfies the system (13) and the initial conditions (14).
Remark 2: If w(α)=∑nj=1cjδ(α−jγ), (0<nγ≤1 or2), then the distributed-order Bagley-Torvik (2) converts to multi-order time-fractional differential equation, therefore the first step is not required.
Now, numerical method to solving the system (13) and the initial conditions (14) is presented, which is based on the Grunwald-Letnikov's approximation described in [19].
Suppose P is integer numbers so that T=hP. We use a uniform grid
{tk=kh:k=0,1,…,P}. |
(15) |
Let ˜y(tk) denote the approximation to y(tk) and also we have already calculated approximation ˜y(tk)≈y(tk), (k=0,1,…,n−1≤P). Therefore, a general numerical solution of the system (13) and the initial conditions (14) can be expressed by using the relations (6) and (7) as
{˜y0(tn)=˜y1(tn−1)hγ−∑nk=1c(γ)k˜y0(tn−k)˜y1(tn)=˜y2(tn−1)hγ−∑nk=1c(γ)k˜y1(tn−k)˜y2(tn)=˜y3(tn−1)hγ−∑nk=1c(γ)k˜y2(tn−k)⋮˜yN−2(tn)=˜yN−1(tn−1)hγ−∑nk=1c(γ)k˜yN−2(tn−k)˜yN−1(tn)=(f(t)−g(˜y0(tn),…,˜yN−1(tn)))hγ−∑nk=1c(γ)k˜yN−1(tn−k) |
(16) |
subject to initial conditions
˜y0(0)=υ1,˜yM(0)=υ2. |
(17) |
In [19], the consistence, convergence and stability of the numerical method mentioned above are studied.
Remark 3: The error associated with the approximation of a multi-term equation using the Grunwald-Letnikov method, is of the order O(h(1+γ)).
The fractional differential transform method is applied to solve fractional differential equations. For applying this method, one should be familiar with the basic idea of the fractional differential transform method. Let us expand the analytical and continuous function f(t) in terms of a fractional power series as follows
f(t)=∞∑k=0F(k)(t−t0)kα |
(18) |
where α is the order of fraction and F(k) is the fractional differential transform of f(t).
In order to avoid fractional initial and boundary conditions, we define the fractional derivative in the Caputo sense. The relation between the Riemann-Liouville operator and Caputo operator is given by
ct0Dqtf(t)=1Γ(m−q)dmdtm∫tt0f(τ)(t−τ)1+q−mdτ−m−1∑k=01k!(t−t0)kf(k)(t0) |
where m−1<q≤m and t>t0.
For the sake of simplicity of the following transformation the initial condition will be implemented to the integer order derivatives
F(k)={1(kα)![dkαf(t)dtkα]t=t0,if kα∈Z+0,if kα∉Z+ |
for k=0,1,2,…,(qα−1), where q is the order of fractional differential equation considered.
Using (4) and (18), the following theorems of fractional differential transform method are given below. A complete discussion on the proofs of these theorems can be found in [20], [21].
Theorem 2: If f(t)=g(t)±h(t), then F(k)=G(k)±H(k).
Theorem 3: If f(t)=g(t)h(t), then F(k)=∑kl=0G(l)×\\ H(k−l).
Theorem 4: If f(t)=g1(t)g2(x)…gn−1(t)gn(t), then
F(k)=k∑kn−1=0kn−1∑kn−2=0…k3∑k2=0k2∑k1=0 (G1(k1)G2(k2−k1)…Gn(kn−kn−1)). |
Theorem 5: If f(t)=(t−t0)p, then F(k)=δ(k−αp), where
δ(k)={1,if k=00,if k≠0. |
Theorem 6: If f(t)=Dqt0[g(t)], then
F(k)=Γ(1+q+kα)Γ(1+kα)G(k+αq). |
(19) |
Now assume that q=γ and α=M, thus, according to fractional differential transform method, by taking differential transform on both sides of the system (13) and the initial conditions (14) are transformed as follows
Y0(k+1)=Γ(k+MM)Γ(k+M+1M)Y1(k)Y1(k+1)=Γ(k+MM)Γ(k+M+1M)Y2(k)Y3(k+1)=Γ(k+MM)Γ(k+M+1M)Y4(k)⋮YN−2(k+1)=Γ(k+MM)Γ(k+M+1M)YN−1(k)YN−1(k+1)=Γ(k+MM)Γ(k+M+1M)(F(k)−G(k)) |
(20) |
subject to initial conditions
Y0(0)=υ1,Y1(0)=0,…,YM−1(0)=0YM(0)=υ2,YM+1(0)=0,…,YN−2(0)=0YN−1(0)=0. |
(21) |
Therefore, according to differential transform method the K-term approximations for (13) can be expressed as
y(t)≈y0(t)=K∑i=1Y0tiM. |
(22) |
In this section, we present some examples to illustrate the efficiency of the methods. In the following, five different cases of the weighting function of order are discussed respectively.
Case 1: cDw(α)ty(t)=∫10δ(α−12)cDαty(t)dα and a=b=c=1, with the initial conditions
y(0)=0,y′(0)=0 |
where
f(t)=t3+6t+3.2t2.5Γ(0.5) |
and the exact solution is y(t)=t3. The obtained numerical result by means of the proposed FDTM solution, GLM solution and exact solution are shown in Fig. 1, with the final time T=10, K=8 and h=0.01 when w(α) be Case 1.
Case 2: cDw(α)ty(t)=∫20δ(α−32)cDαty(t)dα and a=b=c=1, with the initial conditions
y(0)=0,y′(0)=0 |
where
f(t)=t2+2+4t0.5Γ(0.5) |
and the exact solution is y(t)=t2. Fig. 2 presents a comparison of the numerical solutions FDTM, GLM and the exact solution by step size h=0.01, K=8 and T=10 when w(α) be Case 2.
Case 3: cDw(α)ty(t)=∫20δ(α−32)+δ(α−1)+δ(α−12) cDαty(t)dα and a=b=c=1, with the initial conditions
y(0)=0,y′(0)=0 |
where
f(t)=t3+3t2+6t+8t1.5Γ(0.5)+3.2t2.5Γ(0.5) |
and the exact solution is y(t)=t3. Comparison of numerical results with the exact solution is shown in Fig. 3 by step size h=0.01, K=8 and T=10 when w(α) be Case 3.
Case 4: cDw(α)ty(t)=∫106α(1−α)cDαty(t)dα and a=1,b=0.5,c=1.5, with the initial conditions
y(0)=0,y′(0)=0 |
where
f(t)=8. |
We show the numerical solutions in Fig. 4 with step size h=0.01, H=0.25, T=10 and K=T/h when w(α) be Case 4.
Case 5: cDw(α)ty(t)=∫10Γ(4−α)cDαty(t)dα and a=1,b=2,c=0.5, with the initial conditions
y(0)=0,y′(0)=1 |
where
f(t)=−3t3+2. |
We show the numerical solutions in Fig. 5 with step size h=0.01, H=0.25, T=10 and K=T/h when w(α) be Case 4.
In this paper, two schemes for the distributed-order Bagley-Torvik equation with respect to the nonnegative density function have been described. First, by approximating the integral term in the distributed-order equation using the composite Boole's rule, we obtained a multi-term time-fractional equation. Afterwards, the multi-term time-fractional differential equation is solved by the Grunwald-Letnikov method and the fractional differential transform method. Eventually, five examples of distributed-order Bagley-Torvik equation are presented to illustrate the efficiency and reliability of the methods. All numerical results are obtained using MATLAB 7.11.
[1] |
P. S. Georgilakis, "Technical challenges associated with the integration of wind power into power systems, " Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. , vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 852-863, Apr. 2008. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032106001250
|
[2] |
L. Soder, L. Hofmann, A. Orths, H. Holttinen, Y. H. Wan, and A. Tuohy, "Experience from wind integration in some high penetration areas, " IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. , vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 4-12, Mar. 2007. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4106017/
|
[3] |
A. Tascikaraoglu and M. Uzunoglu, "A review of combined approaches for prediction of short-term wind speed and power, " Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. , vol. 34, pp. 243-254, Jun. 2014. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032114001944
|
[4] |
J. L. Torres, García A, M. De Blas, and A. De Francisco, "Forecast of hourly average wind speed with ARMA models in Navarre (Spain), " Solar Energy, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 65-77, Jul. 2005. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038092X04002877
|
[5] |
E. Erdem and J. Shi, "ARMA based approaches for forecasting the tuple of wind speed and direction, " Appl. Energy, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 1405-1414, Apr. 2011. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261910004332
|
[6] |
A. Sfetsos, "A novel approach for the forecasting of mean hourly wind speed time series, " Renew. Energy, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 163-174, Oct. 2002. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148101001938
|
[7] |
R. G. Kavasseri and K. Seetharaman, "Day-ahead wind speed forecasting using f-ARIMA models, " Renew. Energy, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 1388-1393, May 2009. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148108003327
|
[8] |
K. G. Sheela and S. N. Deepa, "Neural network based hybrid computing model for wind speed prediction, " Neurocomputing, vol. 122, pp. 425-429, Dec. 2013. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925231213006164
|
[9] |
H. Quan, D. Srinivasan, and A. Khosravi, "Short-term load and wind power forecasting using neural network-based prediction intervals, " IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. , vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 303-315, Feb. 2014. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6581855/
|
[10] |
Z. H. Guo, J. Wu, H. Y. Lu, and J. Z. Wang, "A case study on a hybrid wind speed forecasting method using BP neural network, " Knowl. Based Syst. , vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 1048-1056, Oct. 2011. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950705111000852
|
[11] |
R. Ak, O. Fink, and E. Zio, "Two machine learning approaches for short-term wind speed time-series prediction, " IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. , vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 1734-1747, Aug. 2015, doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2015.2418739.
|
[12] |
L. Zjavka, "Wind speed forecast correction models using polynomial neural networks, " Renew. Energy, vol. 83, pp. 998-1006, Nov. 2015. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148115003341
|
[13] |
J. J. Wang, W. Y. Zhang, J. Z. Wang, T. T. Han, and L. B. Kong, "A novel hybrid approach for wind speed prediction, " Inf. Sci. , vol. 273, pp. 304-318, Jul. 2014. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020025514002941
|
[14] |
G. Li and J. Shi, "On comparing three artificial neural networks for wind speed forecasting, " Appl. Energy, vol. 87, no. 7, pp. 2313-2320, Jul. 2010. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261909005364
|
[15] |
I. G. Damousis, M. C. Alexiadis, J. B. Theocharis, and P. S. Dokopoulos, "A fuzzy model for wind speed prediction and power generation in wind parks using spatial correlation, " IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. , vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 352-361, Jun. 2004. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/icp.jsp?arnumber=1300701
|
[16] |
Petković D, "Adaptive neuro-fuzzy approach for estimation of wind speed distribution, " Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. , vol. 73, pp. 389-392, Dec. 2015. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142061515002446
|
[17] |
D. Petković, S. Shamshirband, C. W. Tong, and E. T. Al-Shammari, "Generalized adaptive neuro-fuzzy based method for wind speed distribution prediction, " Flow Meas. Instrum. , vol. 43, pp. 47-52, Jun. 2015. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/s0955598615000278
|
[18] |
H. Liu, H. Q. Tian, and Y. F. Li, "Comparison of new hybrid FEEMDMLP, FEEMD-ANFIS, Wavelet Packet-MLP and Wavelet Packet-ANFIS for wind speed predictions, " Energy Convers. Manage. , vol. 89, pp. 1-11, Jan. 2015. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196890414008619
|
[19] |
S. An, H. Shi, Q. H. Hu, X. Q. Li, and J. W. Dang, "Fuzzy rough regression with application to wind speed prediction, " Inf. Sci. , vol. 282, pp. 388-400, Oct. 2014. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020025514003818
|
[20] |
J. Q. Yi, N. Yubazaki, and K. Hirota, "Upswing and stabilization control of inverted pendulum system based on the SIRMs dynamically connected fuzzy inference model, " Fuzzy Sets Syst. , vol. 122, no. 1, pp. 139-152, Aug. 2001. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016501140000049X
|
[21] |
J. Q. Yi, N. Yubazaki, and K. Hirota, "A new fuzzy controller for stabilization of parallel-type double inverted pendulum system, " Fuzzy Sets Syst. , vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 105-119, Feb. 2002. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165011401000288
|
[22] |
J. Q. Yi, N. Yubazaki, and K. Hirota, "A proposal of SIRMs dynamically connected fuzzy inference model for plural input fuzzy control, " Fuzzy Sets Syst. , vol. 125, no. 1, pp. 79-82, Jan. 2002. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165011400001354
|
[23] |
J. Q. Yi, N. Yubazaki, and K. Hirota, "Anti-swing and positioning control of overhead traveling crane, " Inf. Sci. , vol. 155, no. 1-2, pp. 19-42, Oct. 2003. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020025503001270
|
[24] |
H. Seki, H. Ishii, and M. Mizumoto, "On the monotonicity of single input type fuzzy reasoning methods, " IEICE Trans. Fund. Electron. Commun. Comput. Sci. , vol. E90-A, no. 7, pp. 1462-1468, Jul. 2007. doi: 10.1093/ietfec/e90-a.7.1462
|
[25] |
H. Seki, H. Ishii, and M. Mizumoto, "On the generalization of single input rule modules connected type fuzzy reasoning method, " IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. , vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 1180-1187, Oct. 2008. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4497918/
|
[26] |
J. Kim and J. S. Lee, "Sufficient conditions for monotonically constrained functional-type SIRMs connected fuzzy systems, " in Proc. 2010 IEEE Int. Conf. Fuzzy Systems, Barcelona, Spain, 2010, pp. 1-6.
|
[27] |
H. Seki and M. Mizumoto, "SIRMs connected fuzzy inference method adopting emphasis and suppression, " Fuzzy Sets Syst. , vol. 215, pp. 112-126, Mar. 2013. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2431030
|
[28] |
H. Seki, "Nonlinear function approximation using fuzzy functional SIRMs inference model, " in Proc. the 11th WSEAS Int. Conf. Artificial Intelligence, Knowledge Engineering and Data Bases, Cambridge, UK, 2012, pp. 201-206. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/267365806_Nonlinear_Function_Approximation_Using_Fuzzy_Functional_SIRMs_Inference_Model
|
[29] |
H. Seki, H. Ishii, and M. Mizumoto, "Nonlinear identification and medical diagnosis system using functional-type SIRMs connected fuzzy inference method, " Int. J. Innov. Comput. Inf. Control, vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 5275-5286, Nov. 2010. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/289690317_Nonlinear_identification_and_medical_diagnosis_system_using_functional-type_sirms_connected_fuzzy_inference_method
|
[30] |
O. Nelles, Nonlinear System Identification. Berlin Heidelberg:SpringerVerlag, 2001.
|
[31] |
V. N. Vapnik, Statistical Learning Theory. New York:Wiley, 1998.
|
[32] |
A. Blumer, A. Ehrenfeucht, D. Haussler, and M. K. Warmuth, "Learnability and the Vapnik-Chervonenkis dimension, " J. the ACM (JACM), vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 929-965, Oct. 1989.
|
[33] |
J. Neter, W. Wasserman, and M. H. Kutner, " Applied Linear Statistical Models. 4th ed. Chicago:Irwin, 1996.
|
[34] |
T. Wang, H. J. Gao, and J. B. Qiu, "A combined adaptive neural network and nonlinear model predictive control for multirate networked industrial process control, " IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. , vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 416-425, Feb. 2016. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7087381/
|
[35] |
J. B. Qiu, S. X. Ding, H. J. Gao, and S. Yin, "Fuzzy-model-based reliable static output feedback H∞ control of nonlinear hyperbolic PDE systems, " IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. , vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 388-400, Apr. 2016, doi: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2015.2457934.
|
[36] |
J. B. Qiu, Y. L. Wei, and H. R. Karimi, "New approach to delaydependent H∞ control for continuous-time Markovian jump systems with time-varying delay and deficient transition descriptions, " J. Franklin Inst. , vol. 352, no. 1, pp. 189-215, Jan. 2015.
|
[1] | Shaobo He, Kehui Sun, Huihai Wang. Dynamics of the Fractional-Order Lorenz System Based on Adomian Decomposition Method and Its DSP Implementation[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2024, 11(5): 1298-1300. doi: 10.1109/JAS.2016.7510133 |
[2] | Dingxin He, HaoPing Wang, Yang Tian, Yida Guo. A Fractional-Order Ultra-Local Model-Based Adaptive Neural Network Sliding Mode Control of n-DOF Upper-Limb Exoskeleton With Input Deadzone[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2024, 11(3): 760-781. doi: 10.1109/JAS.2023.123882 |
[3] | Zhe Gao. Stable Model Order Reduction Method for Fractional-Order Systems Based on Unsymmetric Lanczos Algorithm[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2019, 6(2): 485-492. doi: 10.1109/JAS.2019.1911399 |
[4] | Hossein Aminikhah, Mahdieh Tahmasebi, Mahmoud Mohammadi Roozbahani. The Multi-scale Method for Solving Nonlinear Time Space Fractional Partial Differential Equations[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2019, 6(1): 299-306. doi: 10.1109/JAS.2016.7510058 |
[5] | Lifeng Wu, Sifeng Liu, Yingjie Yang. Using the Fractional Order Method to Generalize Strengthening Buffer Operator and Weakening Buffer Operator[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2018, 5(6): 1074-1078. doi: 10.1109/JAS.2016.7510214 |
[6] | Ahmet Bekir, Ozkan Guner, Adem Cevikel. The Exp-function Method for Some Time-fractional Differential Equations[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2017, 4(2): 315-321. doi: 10.1109/JAS.2016.7510172 |
[7] | Sathiyaraj T., Balasubramaniam P.. Controllability of Fractional Order Stochastic Differential Inclusions with Fractional Brownian Motion in Finite Dimensional Space[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2016, 3(4): 400-410. |
[8] | Norelys Aguila-Camacho, Manuel A. Duarte-Mermoud. Improving the Control Energy in Model Reference Adaptive Controllers Using Fractional Adaptive Laws[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2016, 3(3): 332-337. |
[9] | Yan Ma, Xiuwen Zhou, Bingsi Li, Hong Chen. Fractional Modeling and SOC Estimation of Lithium-ion Battery[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2016, 3(3): 281-287. |
[10] | Bingsan Chen, Chunyu Li, Benjamin Wilson, Yijian Huang. Fractional Modeling and Analysis of Coupled MR Damping System[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2016, 3(3): 288-294. |
[11] | Kecai Cao, YangQuan Chen, Daniel Stuart. A Fractional Micro-Macro Model for Crowds of Pedestrians Based on Fractional Mean Field Games[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2016, 3(3): 261-270. |
[12] | Kai Chen, Junguo Lu, Chuang Li. The Ellipsoidal Invariant Set of Fractional Order Systems Subject to Actuator Saturation: The Convex Combination Form[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2016, 3(3): 311-319. |
[13] | Cuihong Wang, Huanhuan Li, YangQuan Chen. H∞ Output Feedback Control of Linear Time-invariant Fractional-order Systems over Finite Frequency Range[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2016, 3(3): 304-310. |
[14] | Zeeshan Alam, Liguo Yuan, Qigui Yang. Chaos and Combination Synchronization of a New Fractional-order System with Two Stable Node-foci[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2016, 3(2): 157-164. |
[15] | Xiaojuan Chen, Jun Zhang, Tiedong Ma. Parameter Estimation and Topology Identification of Uncertain General Fractional-order Complex Dynamical Networks with Time Delay[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2016, 3(3): 295-303. |
[16] | Mojtaba Naderi Soorki, Mohammad Saleh Tavazoei. Constrained Swarm Stabilization of Fractional Order Linear Time Invariant Swarm Systems[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2016, 3(3): 320-331. |
[17] | YangQuan Chen, Dingyü Xue, Antonio Visioli. Guest Editorial for Special Issue on Fractional Order Systems and Controls[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2016, 3(3): 255-256. |
[18] | Bruce J. West, Malgorzata Turalska. The Fractional Landau Model[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2016, 3(3): 257-260. |
[19] | Jiacai Huang, YangQuan Chen, Haibin Li, Xinxin Shi. Fractional Order Modeling of Human Operator Behavior with Second Order Controlled Plant and Experiment Research[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2016, 3(3): 271-280. |
[20] | Fudong Ge, YangQuan Chen, Chunhai Kou. Cyber-physical Systems as General Distributed Parameter Systems: Three Types of Fractional Order Models and Emerging Research Opportunities[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2015, 2(4): 353-357. |