Processing math: 100%
A journal of IEEE and CAA , publishes high-quality papers in English on original theoretical/experimental research and development in all areas of automation
Shuyou Yu, Jing Wang, Yan Wang and Hong Chen, "Disturbance Observer Based Control for Four Wheel Steering Vehicles With Model Reference," IEEE/CAA J. Autom. Sinica, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 1121-1127, Nov. 2018. doi: 10.1109/JAS.2016.7510220
Citation: Shuyou Yu, Jing Wang, Yan Wang and Hong Chen, "Disturbance Observer Based Control for Four Wheel Steering Vehicles With Model Reference," IEEE/CAA J. Autom. Sinica, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 1121-1127, Nov. 2018. doi: 10.1109/JAS.2016.7510220

Disturbance Observer Based Control for Four Wheel Steering Vehicles With Model Reference

doi: 10.1109/JAS.2016.7510220
Funds:

the National Natural Science Foundation of China 61573165

the National Natural Science Foundation of China 61520106008

the National Natural Science Foundation of China 61703178

More Information
  • This paper presents a disturbance observer based control strategy for four wheel steering systems in order to improve vehicle handling stability. By combination of feedforward control and feedback control, the front and rear wheel steering angles are controlled simultaneously to follow both the desired sideslip angle and the yaw rate of the reference vehicle model. A nonlinear three degree-of-freedom four wheel steering vehicle model containing lateral, yaw and roll motions is built up, which also takes the dynamic effects of crosswind into consideration. The disturbance observer based control method is provided to cope with ignored nonlinear dynamics and to handle exogenous disturbances. Finally, a simulation experiment is carried out, which shows that the proposed four wheel steering vehicle can guarantee handling stability and present strong robustness against external disturbances.

     

  • With the rapid development of automobile industry, handling stability related to vehicle safety has attracted more attention. The four wheel steering (4WS) vehicles have been studied in order to improve the maneuverability of vehicle at low speed and enhance the stability at high speed. As rear wheels participate in steering process, the transient response of a vehicle can be improved [1], [2].

    Traditional 4WS vehicles mainly refer to automobiles with active rear wheel steering systems, and their control types include both feedforward control and feedback control [3]. Early 4WS vehicles intend to achieve zero sideslip angle to reduce the phase difference between lateral acceleration and yaw rate. This kind of 4WS vehicles usually use a feedforward control method. Sano proposes a ratio between rear wheels and front wheels, which can guarantee a zero sideslip angle during steady steering [4]. This method is easy to implement, but it increases the time it takes for yaw rate and lateral acceleration to reach steady states. Thus, it does not perform well during transient motion. For 4WS vehicles using the feedback control method, two control strategies are presented. One also focuses on reaching a zero sideslip angle, the other focuses on tracking the reference yaw rate. The feedback control method has the characteristic of fast response, which can effectively reduce the effect of external disturbances. Quite a few modern 4WS control methods are established based on it. In [5], a set of linear maneuvering equations representing 4WS vehicle dynamics is used, which formulates the multi-objective vehicle controllers as a mixed H2/H synthesis. A fuzzy controller based on the state feedback and the sliding-mode control methods is proposed for high-speed 4WS vehicles in [6]. Considering the uncertain problems for 4WS control, robust control schemes have been adopted in [7]-[10].

    The development of the steer-by-wire (SBW) technique has made it possible for front and rear wheels to actively steer, simultaneously [11]. In this paper, motivated by this idea, the strategy of model reference control is proposed in order to achieve both the desired sideslip angle and the yaw rate. With the combination of feedforward control and feedback control, front wheel active steering and rear wheel active steering are used to achieve the desired performance of a reference vehicle model. In [12], a similar model reference control strategy has also been used, where a H output feedback controller is designed. Its simulation results show that the proposed 4WS vehicle can improve vehicle handling and stability, but it only focuses on a linear 4WS model. In this paper, a nonlinear three degree-of-freedom (3DOF) 4WS vehicle model which contains the dynamic effects of crosswind is built up. The model will be used to verify the effectiveness of the proposed controllers. In order to implement it easily, a relatively simple vehicle model, a linear two degree-of-freedom (2DOF) 4WS vehicle model, is used in the controller design stage. While the feedforward and feedback controllers we designed do not consider ignored nonlinear dynamics and external disturbances existing in 4WS system, a disturbance observer based control (DOBC) method is provided to attenuate disturbances.

    The rest of this paper is organized as follows. 4WS vehicle models are built up in Section Ⅱ. Section Ⅲ describes the main results for 4WS control strategy. Disturbance observer based control scheme is illustrated in Section Ⅳ. The simulation results are carried out in Section Ⅴ. Section Ⅵ concludes the paper with a short summary.

    In this section, 4WS vehicle models will be of interest. First a 3DOF 4WS vehicle model with a nonlinear tyre model is set up, which also takes the crosswind disturbance into consideration. Such a model captures the most relevant characteristics associated to lateral and longitudinal stabilization of 4WS vehicle. For simplicity and easy implementation, a linear 4WS vehicle model is used for the design of controllers.

    A nonlinear 3DOF 4WS vehicle model is shown in Fig. 1. The body frame (x,y,z) is fixed at the vehicle's center of gravity (CG). In Fig. 1, β and r are the sideslip angle and the yaw rate of vehicle at CG. m is vehicle mass, ms is sprung mass. hs is the height of sprung mass CG above roll axis, hg is the height of sprung mass CG above ground. φ and ˙φ are roll angle and roll velocity, Ix is the roll moment of inertia of the sprung mass about x axis, Iz is the yaw inertia moment about z axes, and Ixz is the product of inertia of the sprung mass about x and z axes. Cφ is roll damping of vehicle suspension, and kφ is roll stiffness of vehicle suspension. v is the vehicle longitudinal velocity, a and b are longitudinal distances from the front and rear axle to the CG, and L=a+b is the wheelbase of vehicle. Ff and Fr denote the lateral forces of front and rear wheel respectively.

    Figure  1.  The diagram of 3DOF vehicle model.

    Considering lateral, yaw and roll motions, the 3DOF vehicle model of the 4WS system is given by [5], [13]

    mv(˙β+r)+mshs¨φ=ΣFy
    (1)
    Iz˙rIxz¨φ=ΣMz
    (2)
    Ix¨φIxz˙r=ΣLx
    (3)

    where Fy, Mz and Lx are the sums of the external forces and moments acting on the vehicle measured at CG along the car axes.

    As crosswind has some influences on dynamics of the 4WS system, the following equations are

    ΣFy=Ff+Fr+Fw
    (4)
    ΣMz=aFfbFr+Fwlw
    (5)
    ΣLx=mshsgsinφ+mshsv(˙β+r)cosφCφ˙φkφφFwhw
    (6)

    where Fw is the crosswind force, hw is the height of crosswind force acting point above roll axis, and lw is the horizontal distance from crosswind force acting point to vehicle's CG.

    The magic formula tyre model [14] is adopted here to determine the lateral force of front and rear wheels

    Fi=Dsin{Carctan[B(1E)αi+Earctan(Bαi)]}
    (7)

    where Fi and αi represent the lateral force of a wheel and its corresponding slip angle. The parameters B, C, D and E are determined by the tyre structure and the tyre vertical load.

    Assume that β is small and v varies slowly, the front slip angle αf and the rear slip angle αr can be derived by

    αf=βarv+δfαr=β+brv+δr
    (8)

    where δf and δr are respectively the steering angles of the front and rear wheels.

    The vertical load of each tyre includes both the static load and the lateral load transfer caused by the vehicle rolling motion

    {Fzfl=mgb2L+FzfFzfr=mgb2LFzfFzrl=mga2L+FzrFzrr=mga2LFzr.
    (9)

    The lateral load transfer is given by [5]

    {Fzf=ayEf(mslrshfL+musfhuf)+1Ef(kφfφCφf˙φ)Fzr=ayEr(mslfshfL+musrhur)+1Er(kφrφCφr˙φ)
    (10)

    where musf and musr are the front and rear axle loads of unsprung mass, huf and hur are the heights of unsprung mass CG above the front and rear axles, lfs and lrs are the longitudinal distances from the front and the rear axles to the sprung mass CG. Ef and Er are the front and rear wheel tracks, Cφf and Cφr are the roll damping of the front and rear suspensions, kφf and kφr are the roll stiffness of the front and rear suspensions, respectively.

    In order to implement easily, it is reasonable to use a relatively simple vehicle model in the stage of controller design. Two degree-of-freedom vehicle model contains sideslip and yaw rate, which captures the most relevant dynamics of a 4WS vehicle. As is shown in Fig. 2, the coordinate frame is fixed at the vehicle's CG. According to Newton's second law, the vehicle dynamic equations can be written as

    mv(˙β+r)=Ff+FrIz˙r=aFfbFr.
    (11)
    Figure  2.  The diagram of 2DOF vehicle model.

    While the tyre slip angle is small, the front and rear lateral tyre forces vary linearly with their slip angles

    Ff=kfαfFr=krαr
    (12)

    where kf and kr are the cornering stiffness of the front and rear wheels. The front slip angle αf and rear slip angle αr are obtained from (8). Then, (11) can be rewritten as

    mv(˙β+r)=(kf+kr)βakfbkrvr+kfδf+krδrIz˙r=(akfbkr)βa2kf+b2krvr+akfδfbkrδr.
    (13)

    From (13), the state space representation of the linear 4WS vehicle model can be expressed as

    ˙x=Ax+Bu
    (14)

    where x=[β r]T is the state vector, u=[δf δr]T the input vector. The coefficient matrices are given as follows

    A=[kf+krmvbkrakfmv21bkrakfIza2kf+b2krIzv]B=[kfmvkrmvakfIzbkrIz].

    Taking the external disturbances caused by the crosswind into consideration, (11) can be rewritten as

    mv(˙β+r)=Ff+Fr+FwIz˙r=aFfbFr+Fwlw.
    (15)

    In accordance with (14), the state space representation of (15) can be written as

    ˙x=Ax+Bfwf+Bu
    (16)

    where wf=Fw/mv is the normalized disturbance input, and Bf=[1mvlwIz]. The key parameters of 4WS vehicle model used in this paper are collected in Table Ⅰ [13].

    Table  Ⅰ.  PARAMETERS OF 4WS VEHICLE MODEL
    Model parameters Values
    vehicle mass (m) 1500 kg
    sprung mass (ms) 1300 kg
    roll inertia moment (Ix) 450 kg· m2
    yaw inertia moment (Iz) 6000 kg· m2
    the product of inertia (Ixz) 1000 kg· m2
    longitudinal distance from front axle to CG (a) 1.1 m
    longitudinal distance from rear axle to CG (b) 1.4 m
    roll stiffness of vehicle suspension (kφ) 47250 N·/rad
    roll damping of vehicle suspension (Cφ) 2587.5 N·/(rad/s)
    height of sprung mass CG above roll axis (hs) 0.37 m
    cornering stiffness of front wheel 64000 N/rad
    cornering stiffness of rear wheel 52000 N/rad
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The performance requirement of a 4WS vehicle is to improve the vehicle maneuverability at low speed and to enhance vehicle handling stability at high speed. The strategy of 4WS control is proposed in Fig. 3, where the 4WS control problem is simplified as a yaw rate and a sideslip angle tracking problem. δf is the front wheel angle input given by the driver. In order to improve steering characteristics, both the front wheel angel δf and the rear wheel angle δr are chosen as controlled quantities. The desired yaw rate and sideslip angle are provided by the reference model, while the feedback controller is designed to minimize tracking errors. The feedforward controller proposed here guarantees that tracking errors are not too large, which is derived based on the reference model as well. Hence the total control input u is composed of the feedforward control input uf and the feedback control input ue, that is

    u=[δfδr]=uf+ue.
    (17)
    Figure  3.  Model reference control of 4WS vehicle.

    Note that crosswind disturbances here are not considered. In the next section, a disturbance observer will be introduced so as to attenuate the effects of crosswind disturbances.

    In order not to change the driver's perception of vehicle handling, the steady state value of desired reference yaw rate should be the same as that of the front wheel steering (FWS) vehicle with the same parameters. Based on vehicle theory, the desired yaw rate can be described as follows [15]:

    r=vL(1+kv2)11+τrsδfk=mL2(akrbkf)
    (18)

    where r represents the desired reference yaw rate, δf the front wheel angle, k the vehicle stability factor, and τr the time constant of yaw rate. The desired reference sideslip is also approximated as a first order inertia transfer function of the front wheel angle [15],

    β=kβ1+τβsδf
    (19)

    where β represents the desired reference sideslip angle, and τβ is the time constant of the sideslip angle. The term kβ is a proportional gain, which is usually a small constant and can be set to zero in the ideal situation. Thus, kβ=0 is chosen in this paper.

    Define the state vector xd=[β  r]T and the control input vector ud=δf. The state space equation of the reference vehicle model can be expressed as

    ˙xd=Adxd+Bdud
    (20)

    where

    Ad=[1τβ001τβ],Bd=[kβτβkrτr],kβ=0,kr=11+kv2vL.

    Applying Laplace transform on the linear 4WS vehicle model (14), the transfer function matrix can be obtained

    G=(sIA)1B.
    (21)

    The role of feedforward controller Cf(s) is to keep the dynamic response of the linear 4WS vehicle model and the reference model the same. If a given front wheel angle goes through the feedforward controller and the 4WS vehicle model, cf. Fig. 3, the desired reference sideslip angle and yaw rate could be obtained as

    GCfδf=[βr].
    (22)

    Substituting (18), (19) and (21) into (22), the feedforward controller can be obtained

    Cf=[Izvs+akfL+bmv2vkfLvL(1+kv2)11+τrsIzvsbkrL+amv2vkrLvL(1+kv2)11+τrs].
    (23)

    Then the feedforward control input can be expressed as

    uf=Cfδf.
    (24)

    A state feedback controller will be proposed in this part. Define the following error vector as

    xe=xxd=[ββrr].
    (25)

    According to (16), (17) and (20), we get

    ˙xe=Axe+Bue+Bfwf+(Axd+Buf)(Adxd+Bdud)
    (26)

    Substituting (24) into (22), we have

    Guf=xd.
    (27)

    Substituting (21) into (27) and then applying Laplace inverse transform, we get

    ˙xd=Axd+Buf.
    (28)

    Substituting (28) and (20) into (26), the last two terms of (26) are eliminated. Thus a simple state space description of the error system is achieved

    ˙xe=Axe+Bfwf+Bue.
    (29)

    Here we design a linear quadratic regular (LQR) controller without considering disturbances that will be dealt with in the next section. The performance index J is shown as follow

    J=0(xTeQxe+uTeRue)dt
    (30)

    where Q0 and R0 are the weighting matrices

    Q=[40000180],       R=[1001].

    The obtained LQR feedback control gain is

    Ke=[14.067.9612.2210.67].

    In this section, a disturbance observer is designed to deal with the crosswind. Furthermore, this disturbance observer also takes the ignored nonlinear dynamics into account. As the linear vehicle model inevitably neglects some high order nonlinear terms compared with nonlinear vehicle model, a nonlinear function O(xe,ue,wf) is added to (29)

    ˙xe=Axe+Bfwf+Bue+O(xe,ue,wf).
    (31)

    The DOBC approach [16] is used to deal with both disturbances and uncertainties. For simplicity, the effect caused by nonlinearities is merged into the disturbance term, i.e.,

    wd=Bfwf+O(xe,ue,wf).
    (32)

    Substituting (32) into (31), the full dynamic model of the nonlinear 4WS vehicle is described as

    ˙xe=Axe+Bue+Bdwd
    (33)

    where Bd=I is a 2×2 identity matrix. For system (33), the following disturbance observer is employed to estimate the disturbances

    {˙p=LBd(p+Lxe)L(Axe+Bue)ˆwd=p+Lxe
    (34)

    where ˆwd is a disturbance estimate vector, p is an auxiliary vector and L is the observer gain matrix to be designed. The estimates of the disturbance observer (34) can asymptotically track disturbances if the observer gain matrix L is chosen such that LBd is a Hurwitz matrix. According to the disturbance estimate, we attempt to design a disturbance compensation gain vector Kd to attenuate the disturbances in the output channel. Suppose that A+BKe and C(A+BKe)1B are invertible, the disturbance compensation gain vector Kd can be selected as [17]

    Kd=[C(A+BKe)1B]1×C(A+BKe)1Bd.
    (35)

    The disturbance observer control law of system (33) is designed as [16]

    ue=Kexe+Kdˆwd
    (36)

    where Ke is the LQR feedback control law. Here we select the observer gain matrix as

    L=[0.1000.1].
    (37)

    The control structure of the nonlinear 4WS vehicle with the proposed control strategy is shown in Fig. 4. The disturbance compensation gain vector can be obtained based on (35), where

    Kd=[0.930.100.670.10].
    (38)
    Figure  4.  4WS vehicle with the proposed control strategy.

    In this section, some simulation results are given to show the effectiveness of the proposed control strategies for 4WS systems. Choose the vehicle forward velocity as v=20m/s (72km/h) and the step front wheel input as δf=0.087(5), cf. Fig. 5. The crosswind disturbance is presented in Fig. 6. In the same condition, the experimental results for the 4WS vehicle with or without the disturbance observer (the corresponding control strategies are shown in Fig. 3 and Fig. 4) are discussed, while a conventional front wheel steering (FWS) vehicle and a 4WS vehicle with proportional controller are also implemented for comparison. The classic proportional control method uses a speed dependent ration between rear and front wheels in an open-loop controller in order to achieve a zero sideslip angle during directional maneuvers. The ratio between the front and the rear wheel is described as [1]:

    K=δfδr=b+mav2krLa+mbv2kfL.
    (39)
    Figure  5.  Front wheel angle input.
    Figure  6.  Crosswind disturbance input.

    As shown in Fig. 7, the steady-state gain of sideslip angle of 4WS vehicles with or without disturbance observer is much smaller than the one of the proportional control, but the control strategy with disturbance observer is slightly better. In cases where crosswind disturbances occur, both proposed strategies show great advantages. However, only the yaw rate of the 4WS vehicle with disturbance observer can achieve zero tracking error in the steady-state without overshoot Compared with the proportional control for 4WS vehicle, the proposed 4WS control strategies can provide drivers a familiar driving sensation. In addition, the proposed controller both work very well against the crosswind disturbance that occurred from 2 s to 4 s, while the 4WS vehicle based on DOBC is clearly superior.

    Figure  7.  The responses of step steering angle input: 4WS vehicle with disturbance control (cf. Fig. 4), 4WS vehicle without disturbance control (cf. Fig. 3), classic proportional control 4WS vehicle, FWS vehicle.

    On the basis of analyses, it is shown that the proposed disturbance observer based control strategy not only copes with the ignored nonlinear dynamics, but also presents strong robustness against external disturbances. Since there are ignored nonlinear dynamics, it can not achieve desired tracking performance. Although the feedback structure effectively reduces the effect of crosswind disturbances, the additional DOBC can have a better control effect.

    In this paper, a 4WS control strategy based on DOBC approach was presented. First, a nonlinear 3DOF 4WS vehicle model involving dynamic effects of crosswind was introduced. In the stage of controller design, a relatively simple vehicle model, the linear 2DOF 4WS vehicle model, was used. Taking the ignored nonlinear dynamics and crosswind disturbances into consideration, a disturbance observer was designed. Finally, step response experiments were carried out, which showed that the proposed 4WS vehicle with disturbance observer is superior to the 4WS vehicle without the disturbance observer, FWS vehicle, and 4WS vehicle with the classical proportional control. The proposed scheme not only copes with ignored nonlinear dynamics, but also presents strong robustness against external disturbances.

  • [1]
    Y. Furukawa, N. Yuhara, S. Sano, H. Takeda, and Y. Matsushita, "A review of four-wheel steering studies from the viewpoint of vehicle dynamics and control, " Vehicle Syst. Dyn., vol. 18, no. 1-3, pp. 151-186, 1989. doi: 10.1080/00423118908968917
    [2]
    G. D. Yin, N. Chen, and P. Li, "Improving handling stability performance of four-wheel steering vehicle via μ-synthesis robust control, " IEEE Trans. Vehic. Technol., vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 2432-2439, Sep. 2007. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4305552/
    [3]
    J. Ackermann and W. Sienel, "Robust yaw damping of cars with front and rear wheel steering, " IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. Article No. 4421524, Mar. 1993. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=221348
    [4]
    S. Sano, Y. Furukawa, and S. Shiraishi, "Four wheel steering system with rear wheel steer angle controlled as a function of steering wheel angle, " SAE Technical Paper 860625, 1986. https://www.mendeley.com/research-papers/four-wheel-steering-system-rear-wheel-steer-angle-controlled-function-steering-wheel-angle/
    [5]
    S. S. You and Y. H. Chai, "Multi-objective control synthesis: an application to 4WS passenger vehicles, " Mechatronics, vol. 9. no, 4, pp. 363-390, Jun. 1999. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957415898000567
    [6]
    A. Alfi and M. Farrokhi, "Hybrid state-feedback sliding-mode controller using fuzzy logic for four-wheel-steering vehicles, " Vehicle Syst. Dyn., vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 265-284, 2009. doi: 10.1080/00423110801995727
    [7]
    H. M. Lv, N. Chen, and P. Li, "Multi-objective H optimal control for four-wheel steering vehicle based on yaw rate tracking, " Proc. Inst. Mechan. Eng., vol. 218, no. 10, pp. 1117-1123, 2004. doi: 10.1177/095440700421801006
    [8]
    G. D. Yin, N. Chen, J. X. Wang, and L. Y. Wu, "A study on μ-Synthesis control for four-wheel steering system to enhance vehicle lateral stability, " J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control, vol. 133, no. 1, pp. Article No. 011002, Nov. 2011. doi: 10.1115/1.4002707
    [9]
    C. F. Chen and Y. M. Jia, "Nonlinear decoupling control of four-wheel-steering vehicles with an observer, " Int. J. Control Autom. Syst., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 697-702, Aug. 2012. doi: 10.1007/s12555-012-0404-7
    [10]
    F. N. Koumboulis and M. G. Skarpetis, "Robust control of cars with front and rear wheel steering, " IEE Proc. Control Theory Appl., vol. 149, no. 5, pp. 394-404, Sep. 2002. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=1048967
    [11]
    B. T. Fijalkowski, "Steer-by-wire (SBW) four-wheel steering (4WS) conversion mechatronic control systems, " in Automotive Mechatronics: Operational and Practical Issues, Netherlands: Springer, 2011. doi: 10.1007%2F978-94-007-1183-9_4
    [12]
    J. Wang, S. Y. Yu, and H. Chen, "Model following control of active 4WS vehicle based on constrained output feedback H control, " Information and Control, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 53-59, 2015. http://ic.sia.cn/EN/Y2016/V45/I1/53
    [13]
    H. Zhang, "The research on stability control of high speed vehicle under crosswind based on active 4WS system, " M. S. thesis, Zhengjia Univ., Hangzhou, China, 2014.
    [14]
    H. B. Pacejka and E. Bakker, "The magic formula tyre model, " Vehicle Syst. Dyn., vol. 21, no. s1, pp. 1-18, 1992. doi: 10.1080/00423119208969994
    [15]
    M. Nagai, Y. Hirano, and S. Yamanaka, "Integrated control of active rear wheel steering and direct yaw moment control, " Vehicle Syst. Dyn., vol. 27, no. 5-6, pp. 357-370, 1997. doi: 10.1080/00423119708969336
    [16]
    W. H. Chen, "Disturbance observer based control for nonlinear systems, " IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 706-710, Dec. 2004. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1372532/citations
    [17]
    J. Yang, A. Zolotas, W. H. Chen, K. Michail, and S. H. Li, "Robust control of nonlinear MAGLEV suspension system with mismatched uncertainties via DOBC approach, " ISA Trans., vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 389-396, Jul. 2011. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019057811000073
  • Related Articles

    [1]Hongxing Xiong, Guangdeng Chen, Hongru Ren, Hongyi Li. Broad-Learning-System-Based Model-Free Adaptive Predictive Control for Nonlinear MASs Under DoS Attacks[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2025, 12(2): 381-393. doi: 10.1109/JAS.2024.124929
    [2]Chenxi Gu, Xinli Wang, Kang Li, Xiaohong Yin, Shaoyuan Li, Lei Wang. Enhanced Tube-Based Event-Triggered Stochastic Model Predictive Control With Additive Uncertainties[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2025, 12(3): 596-605. doi: 10.1109/JAS.2024.124974
    [3]Qun Lu, Xiang Wu, Jinhua She, Fanghong Guo, Li Yu. Disturbance Rejection for Systems With Uncertainties Based on Fixed-Time Equivalent-Input-Disturbance Approach[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2024, 11(12): 2384-2395. doi: 10.1109/JAS.2024.124650
    [4]Zheng Chen, Shizhao Zhou, Chong Shen, Litong Lyu, Junhui Zhang, Bin Yao. Observer-Based Adaptive Robust Precision Motion Control of a Multi-Joint Hydraulic Manipulator[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2024, 11(5): 1213-1226. doi: 10.1109/JAS.2024.124209
    [5]Changjun He, Hua Geng, Kaushik Rajashekara, Ambrish Chandra. Analysis and Control of Frequency Stability in Low-Inertia Power Systems: A Review[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2024, 11(12): 2363-2383. doi: 10.1109/JAS.2024.125013
    [6]Dan Zhang, Jiabin Hu, Jun Cheng, Zheng-Guang Wu, Huaicheng Yan. A Novel Disturbance Observer Based Fixed-Time Sliding Mode Control for Robotic Manipulators With Global Fast Convergence[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2024, 11(3): 661-672. doi: 10.1109/JAS.2023.123948
    [7]Wei Chen, Qinglei Hu. Sliding-Mode-Based Attitude Tracking Control of Spacecraft Under Reaction Wheel Uncertainties[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2023, 10(6): 1475-1487. doi: 10.1109/JAS.2022.105665
    [8]Haoxiang Ma, Mou Chen, Qingxian Wu. Disturbance Observer-Based Safe Tracking Control for Unmanned Helicopters With Partial State Constraints and Disturbances[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2023, 10(11): 2056-2069. doi: 10.1109/JAS.2022.105938
    [9]Yashar Mousavi, Alireza Alfi, Ibrahim Beklan Kucukdemiral, Afef Fekih. Tube-based Model Reference Adaptive Control for Vibration Suppression of Active Suspension Systems[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2022, 9(4): 728-731. doi: 10.1109/JAS.2022.105470
    [10]Yantao Tian, Xuanhao Cao, Xiaoyu Wang, Yanbo Zhao. Four Wheel Independent Drive Electric Vehicle Lateral Stability Control Strategy[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2020, 7(6): 1542-1554. doi: 10.1109/JAS.2019.1911729
    [11]Four Wheel Independent Drive Electric Vehicle Lateral Stability Control Strategy[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2018, 1(1): 1-13. doi: 10.1109/JAS.2019.1911639
    [12]Lei Chen, Yan Yan, Chaoxu Mu, Changyin Sun. Characteristic Model-based Discrete-time Sliding Mode Control for Spacecraft with Variable Tilt of Flexible Structures[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2016, 3(1): 42-50.
    [13]Norelys Aguila-Camacho, Manuel A. Duarte-Mermoud. Improving the Control Energy in Model Reference Adaptive Controllers Using Fractional Adaptive Laws[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2016, 3(3): 332-337.
    [14]Xiaohua Xia, Jiangfeng Zhang. Operation Efficiency Optimisation Modelling and Application of Model Predictive Control[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2015, 2(2): 166-172.
    [15]Lu Wang, Jianbo Su. Trajectory Tracking of Vertical Take-off and Landing Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Based on Disturbance Rejection Control[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2015, 2(1): 65-73.
    [16]Pei Jia, Fei Hao, Hao Yu. Function Observer Based Event-triggered Control for Linear Systems with Guaranteed L-Gain[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2015, 2(4): 394-402.
    [17]Chaoxu Mu, Qun Zong, Bailing Tian, Wei Xu. Continuous Sliding Mode Controller with Disturbance Observer for Hypersonic Vehicles[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2015, 2(1): 45-55.
    [18]Xiaoli Li, Kang Wang, Dexin Liu. An Improved Result of Multiple Model Iterative Learning Control[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2014, 1(3): 315-322.
    [19]Aolei Yang, Wasif Naeem, Minrui Fei. Decentralised Formation Control and Stability Analysis for Multi-vehicle Cooperative Manoeuvre[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2014, 1(1): 92-100.
    [20]Chao Ji, Jing Wang, Liulin Cao, Qibing Jin. Parameters Tuning of Model Free Adaptive Control Based on Minimum Entropy[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2014, 1(4): 361-371.

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(7)  / Tables(1)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1438) PDF downloads(60) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return