
IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica
Citation: | Khatir Khettab, Samir Ladaci and Yassine Bensafia, "Fuzzy Adaptive Control of a Fractional Order Chaotic System With Unknown Control Gain Sign Using a Fractional Order Nussbaum Gain," IEEE/CAA J. Autom. Sinica, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 816-823, May 2019. doi: 10.1109/JAS.2016.7510169 |
FRACTIONAL order chaotic systems are gathering an important research effort because of their powerful properties and potential applications in secure communication and control processing. Many mathematical models have been developed in literature such as the fractional-order Chua system [1], the fractional-order Duffing system [2], the fractional-order Lü system and the fractional order Chen system [3]. Since the work of Deng and Li [4] who investigated the synchronization problem of fractional order chaotic Lü systems, many studies were focused on the control and synchronization of fractional order chaos [5], [6].
In this paper we are concerned by fractional adaptive control of nonlinear fractional order systems using fuzzy logic identification technique. Fractional adaptive systems have been largely investigated for a decade as they showed an improved behavior comparatively to classical adaptive control for partially unknown plants [7]-[10].
Based on the universal approximation theorem, adaptive fuzzy control systems present an effective control solution for a large class of nonlinear systems [11]. The adaptive controller is synthesized from a collection of fuzzy IF-THEN rules and the parameters of the membership functions characterizing the linguistic terms in the IF-THEN rules change according to some adaptive law for the purpose of controlling a plant to track a reference trajectory [12], [13].
A particular class of such nonlinear plants pose the challenging control problem with unknown control directions [14], [15]. The Nussbaum function approach was introduced in the 1980's [16]. This technique was used for adaptive control of first-order nonlinear systems in [17]. Later, many studies of adaptive control schemes with Nussbaum function were successfully carried out for different classes of nonlinear systems [18]-[20].
The main contribution of this study is the introduction of a Nussbaum function in the fuzzy adaptive control scheme for nonlinear fractional systems with unknown control gain sign. Stability analysis of the proposed adaptive fuzzy control system is performed using Lyapunov stability theory. Moreover, the influence of the approximation error and external disturbance on the tracking error can be attenuated to an arbitrarily prescribed level via the proposed design technique. The fuzzy adaptive control design with Nussbaum function is applied for nonlinear fractional order chaotic systems with a large uncertainty or unknown variation in plant parameters and structures. The Grünwald-Letnikov technique is used for the numerical approximation of the fractional order chaotic system [21].
This paper is organized as follows: in Section Ⅱ, basic definitions and preliminaries for fractional order systems are presented with the numerical approximation technique. A description of the Nussbaum-type function is given in Section Ⅲ. Section Ⅳ presents the fuzzy adaptive control scheme with unknown control direction for uncertain fractional order chaotic systems in the presence of uncertainty. The proposed control system stability proof is detailed in Section Ⅴ. In Section Ⅵ, application of the proposed method on fractional order chaotic Duffing systems is investigated. Finally, the simulation results and conclusion are presented in Section Ⅶ.
The mathematical definition of fractional derivatives and integrals has been the subject of several descriptions. The three most frequently used definitions for the general fractional differ-integral are: the Grünwald-Letnikov (GL) definition, the Riemann-Liouville (RL) and the Caputo definition [9], [21]. The Riemann-Liouville definition of the fractional order integral is given by
RLaD−μtf(t)=1Γ(μ)∫ta(t−τ)μ−1f(τ)d(τ) |
(1) |
while the definition of fractional order derivatives is
RLaDμtf(t)=ddt[RLaD−(1−μ)tf(t)]=1Γ(1−μ)ddt∫ta(t−τ)−μf(τ)d(τ) |
(2) |
where
Γ(x)=∫∞0yx−1e−ydy |
(3) |
where Γ(⋅) is the Euler's Gamma function, a and t are the limits of the operation, and μ is the number identifying the fractional order. In this paper, μ is assumed to be a real number that satisfies the restriction 0<μ<1. Also, it is assumed that a=0. The following convention is used: aDμt≡Dμ.
Many different approaches have been proposed to model fractional order systems. The numerical simulation of such systems depends on the way to approximate the fractional derivative operator. The most common approach used in the fractional order chaotic systems literature is an improved version of the Adams-Bashforth-Moulton method based on predictor-correctors [22], [23]. However, we will use in this work a simpler approach consisting of the fractional order derivative operator discretization according to the Grünwald-Letnikov method. This method is very simple to use and has approximately the same order of accuracy as the predictor-corrector method, even if the simulation requires, for each step the computation of sums of increasing dimension with time.
The Grünwald-Letnikov fractional order derivative definition is expressed as
GLaD−μt=limh→01hμ[t−ah]∑j=0(−1)j(μj)f(t−jh) |
(4) |
where (t−a)/h indicates the integer part and (−1)j(μj) are binomial coefficients c(μ)j, j=0,1,….
The calculation of these coefficients is done by a formula of following recurrence:
c(μ)0=1; c(μ)j=(1−1+μj)c(μ)j−1. |
The general numerical solution of the fractional differential equation
GLaD−μt=f(y(t)) |
(5) |
can be expressed as follows:
y(tk)=f(y(tk),tk)hμ−k∑j=0c(μ)jy(tk−j). |
(6) |
This approximation of the fractional derivative within the meaning of Grünwald-Letnikov is on the one hand equivalent to the definition of Riemman-Liouville for a broad class of functions [24], and on the other hand, it is well adapted to the definition of Caputo (Adams method) because it requires only the initial conditions and has a clear physical direction.
Definition 1: A function N(ζ) is called a Nussbaum-type function if it has the following properties [14], [25]-[27]:
lims→∞sup1s∫s0N(ζ)dζ=+∞ |
(7) |
lims→∞inf1s∫s0N(ζ)dζ=−∞. |
(8) |
The continuous functions
N1(ζ)=ζ2cos(ζ)N2(ζ)=ζcos(√|ζ|)N3(ζ)=cos(π2ζ)eζ2N4(ζ)=ln(ζ+1)cos(√ln(ζ+1)) |
are Nussbaum functions.
For example the continuous function N1(ζ)=ζ2cos(ζ), is positive at interval (2πn,2πn+π/2) and negative at the interval (2πn+π/2,2πn+3π/2), where n is an integer. And we have
12πn+π2∫2πn+π20N1(ζ)dζ=+∞ |
12πn+3π2∫2πn+3π20N1(ζ)dζ=−∞. |
The following lemma [28] is used in the stability analysis.
Lemma 1: Consider the following fractional-order system
Dαy(t)=−ay(t)+b |
(9) |
then there exists a constant t0>0 such that for all t∈(t0,∞)
‖y(t)‖≤2ba |
(10) |
where y(t) is the state variable, and a, b are two positive constants.
The proof of Lemma 1 can be found in [28].
A Nussbaum function will be used in future work, to estimate the control direction.
Consider a fractional order SISO nonlinear dynamic system of the form
{x(q1)1=x2 ⋮x(qn−1)n−1=xnx(qn)n=f(x_,t)+g(x_,t)u+d(t)y=x1 |
(11) |
where x_=[x1,x2,…,xn]T=[x,x(q),x(2q),…,x((n−1)q)]T ∈ Rn is the system's state vector, u∈R is the control input and y∈R is the output, with the initial conditions: u(0)=0 and y(0)=0.
The initial conditions are set to zero to avoid the lack of robustness for Nussbaum type adaptive controllers as proved by Georgiou and Smith [29].
If q1=q2=⋯=qn=q the above system is called a commensurate order system. Then an equivalent form of the above system is described as
{x(nq)=f(x_,t)+g(x_,t)u+d(t)y=x1 |
(12) |
where f(x_,t) and g(x_,t) are unknown but bounded nonlinear functions which express system dynamics and d(t) is the external bounded disturbance. The control objective is to force the system output y_ to follow a given bounded reference signal y_d, under the constraint that all signals involved must be bounded.
The reference signal vector y_d and the tracking error vector e_ are defined as
y_d=[yd,y(q)d,y(2q)d,…,y((n−1)q)d]T∈Rne_=y_d−y_=[e,e(q),…,e((n−1)q)]T∈Rne(iq)=y(iq)d−y(iq). |
Let k_=[k1,k2,…,kn]T∈Rn be chosen such that the stability condition |arg(eig(A))|>qπ/2 is met, where 0<q < 1 and eig(A) represents the eigenvalues of the system state matrix.
1) Let us first suppose that the functions f(x_,t) and g(x_,t) are known and the system is free of external disturbance (i.e., d(t) = 0).
The following assumptions are considered [19], [20]:
Assumption 1: The control gain g(x_,t) is not zero and of known sign. It is also strictly positive or strictly negative.
Assumption 2: The external disturbance is bounded: |d(t)|≤D with D an unknown positive constant.
Then the control law of the certainty equivalent controller is obtained as [30],
u∗=1g(x_,t)(−f(x_,t)+y(nq)d+kTe) |
(13) |
where
y_d=[yd,y(q)d,y(2q)d,…,y((n−1)q)d]T∈Rn |
e_=y_d−y_=[e,e(q),…,e((n−1)q)]T∈Rne(iq)=y(iq)d−y(iq) |
is the tracking error vector.
Substituting (13) into (12), we have
enq=kne(n−1)q+⋯+k1e=0 |
(14) |
which is the main objective of control, limt→∞e(t)=0.
2) However, f(x_,t) and g(x_,t) are unknown and external disturbance d(t)≠0, the ideal control effort (13) cannot be implemented; this problem was solved by the control strategy proposed previously by the use of fuzzy systems to approximate unknown functions [13]. In this case, we consider the following assumptions [19], [20]:
Assumption 3: The state vector x is not measurable, except the system output y.
Assumption 4: The reference trajectory yd(t) and its derivatives up to order (nq) are known, continuous and bounded.
Assumption 5: The control gain g(x_,t) is not zero and of unknown sign.
Remark 1: In Assumption 5, and contrary to the previous case, the sign of g(x_,t) need not to be known, as the Nussbaum technique will estimate the control gain sign.
From Definition 1, one knows that Nussbaum functions should have infinite gains and infinite switching frequencies. Subsequently to this part, the Nussbaum function
N(ζ)=ζ2cos(ζ) |
will be used for the control of nonlinear chaotic systems.
By substituting (13) into (12) we obtain the closed loop control system in the state space domain as follows:
x_(nq)=Ax_+B[f(x_)+g(x_)u]y=cTx_ |
(15) |
where
A=[0100⋯000010⋯00⋮⋮⋮⋮⋱⋮⋮0000⋯01−k1−k2−k3−k4⋯−k(n−1)−kn]B=[00⋮01], c=[10⋮00]. |
By using the relation y(q)d=Ayd+By(nq)d, the following equation (16) is obtained:
e_(q)=Ae_+B[f(x_)+g(x_)u∗−y(nq)d]e=cTe_. |
(16) |
In what follows, a fuzzy adaptive control will be designed to stabilize the system (11) or the equivalent system (16).
Replacing f(x_) by the fuzzy system f(x_,θf) which is specified as
f(x_,θf)=θTfξ(x_). |
(17) |
Here the fuzzy basis function ξ(x_) depends on the fuzzy membership functions and is supposed to be fixed, while θf is the adjusted by adaptive laws based on a Lyapunov stability criterion.
Using (17), (16) can be rewritten as following:
e_(q)=Ae_+B[ξT(x_)θf+g(x_)u∗−y(nq)d]e=cTe_. |
(18) |
The optimal parameter estimation vector θ∗f is defined by
θ∗f=argminθf∈Ωf[supx∈Ωx|f(x_∣θf)−f(x_,t)|] |
(19) |
with ϕf=θf−θ∗f and Ωf, Ωx are constraints sets for θf and x respectively, and are defined as
Ωf={θf,|θf|≤Mf}Ωx={x,|x|≤Mx} |
(20) |
where Mf and Mx are positive constants.
The following theorem is proposed to show the control performance of the closed loop system.
Theorem 1: Considering system (12), and the fuzzy adaptive control law proposed with fractional Nussbaum function is given as follows:
u∗=N(ζ)[kTe_+θTfξ(x_)−ynqd] |
(21) |
where N(ζ)=ζ2cos(ζ) and
ζ(q)=e_TPB[kTe_+r1θTξ(x_)−y(nq)d] |
(22) |
and the fractional adaptive law for the vector θ is chosen as following:
θ(q)=−r1θ+r1e_TPBξ(x_) |
(23) |
where r1 is a positive constant, and P=PT>0 is a positive definite matrix, also there is a positive definite symmetric matrix Q=QT satisfying the following Lyapunov equation:
AcP+PATc+PBBTP=−Q. |
We choose Ac=A−Bk_T is Hurwitz. So all signals in the closed loop system are bounded and the tracking error converges to a bounded compact set defined by Ω={e1,|e1| ≤ a1}, where a1 is a positive constant.
The Lyapunov function is chosen as
V=12e_TPe_+12r1ϕTfϕf. |
(24) |
The derivative of (24) with respect to time verifies [31], [32]
V(q)(t)≤12(e_(q))TPe_+12e_T(t)Pe_(q)(t)+1r1ϕTfϕ(q)f. |
(25) |
By substituting (18) into (25), we obtain
V(q)(t)≤ 12e_T(PA+ATP)e_+1r1ϕTfϕ(q)f+e_TPB[ξ(x_)θTf+gu∗−y(nq)d]. |
(26) |
By using (21) and (22), (26) becomes
V(q)(t)≤ 12e_T(PA+ATP)e_+1r1ϕTfϕ(q)f+e_TPB[ξ(x_)θTf+gu∗−y(nq)d]−e_PBθTfξ(x_)≤ 12e_T(PA+ATP)e_+ϕTf[1r1ϕ(q)f−e_TPBξ(x_)]+e_TPB[ξ(x_)θTf−y(nq)d]+e_TPBgN(ζ)(kTe_+ξ(x_)θTf−y(nq)d)≤ 12e_T(PAc+ATcP)e_+ϕTf[1r1ϕ(q)f−e_TPBξ(x_)]+[gN(ζ)+1]ζ(q). |
(27) |
Using (23), the following inequality is obtained
ϕTf[1r1ϕ(q)f−e_TPBξ(x_)]=−ϕTfθ=−ϕTfϕf−ϕTfθ∗f≤−12ϕTfϕf+12‖θ∗f‖2. |
(28) |
And thus (Young inequality),
e_TPB≤12e_TPBBTPe_+12b2 |
(29) |
where b is a positive constant.
By substituting (28) and (29) into (27), the following inequality is obtained:
V(q)(t)≤ 12e_T(PAc+ATcP)e_+12e_TPBBTPe_+12b2−12ϕTfϕf+12‖θ∗f‖2+[gN(ζ)+1]ζ(q)≤−12e_TQe_+12b2−12ϕTfϕf+12‖θ∗f‖2+[gN(ζ)+1]ζ(q) |
(30) |
where μ=λmin(QP−1,r1) and β=‖θ∗f‖2+12b2.
The inequality (30) can be expressed as
V(q)≤−μV+ω |
(31) |
where ω=β+[gN(ζ)+1]ζ(q).
Then depending on the sign of ω two cases arise:
1) If ω≤0 then we have V(q)≤0 and the uniform continuity of the fractional order derivative (3) allows to apply Barbalats lemma [33]. Hence, V(t) is bounded and e and θf are also bounded.
2) If ω>0 then according to Lemma 1, we have
‖V(t)‖≤2ωμ. |
(32) |
which yields that
‖e(t)‖≤2√ωμλmin(P). |
This means that ‖e(t)‖ can be made arbitrarily small, and θf is bounded. From (21), u is bounded. Then all the signals in the closed loop system are bounded.
The diagram of the proposed control is given in Fig. 1.
To illustrate the performance of the proposed control approach, we consider two fractional order chaotic systems of Duffing as follows [34],
The first one is a reference system
Dqyd1=yd2Dqyd2=1.2yd1−yd2−y2d1+0.5cos(t). |
(33) |
The second is the response system (to be controlled)
Dqy1= y2Dqy2= y1−1.8y2−y21+0.9cos(t)+u(t)+d(t). |
(34) |
Initial conditions are selected as follows: yd(0)=[0,0]T and y(0)=[1,−1]T.
We consider in this case the fractional order value q=0.98, with the external disturbance d(t)=0.1sin(t).
The other design constants are set as: k1=k2=1, r1 = 200, ρ=0.05, h=0.01 and Tsim=40 s.
The main objective is to control our response system to track the reference system output with consideration that the functions f(x_,t) and g(x_,t) are completely unknown.
Fig. 2 shows the phase plane without the studied control systems. Fig. 3 shows the synchronization performance of Duffing chaotic drive and response systems.
Results & Discussion:
1) According to the Fig. 4, the trajectories of the responses converge accurately to the reference trajectories, even in the presence of external disturbances.
2) One can remark the vibrations in the beginning of Fig. 4 (b) and Fig. 4 (c). This transitory phase is necessary for converge of the system model estimated parameters. They depend mainly on the arbitrary choice of initial conditions.
3) Fig. 5 shows that the errors are bounded and converge asymptotically to zero.
4) From Figs. 6 and 7 one can remark that the adopted settings and the function of Nussbaum which estimates the sign of control gain are always bounded.
In this work, a fuzzy adaptive control scheme is proposed for a class of nonlinear fractional order SISO systems with unknown control gain sign. The fuzzy systems were used to approximate online the unknown dynamics including all nonlinearities of the system. The numerical approximation of the fractional order systems is realized by means of the Grünwald-Letnikov method.
The main contribution of this paper is to introduce the technique of fractional order Nussbaum-type function to estimate the control gain sign for the fractional chaotic system. The developed controller guarantees the boundedness of all the signals in the closed-loop and the tracking error convergence. Simulation results show the good tracking performance of the proposed fuzzy adaptive control method.
[1] |
I. Petráš s, "A note on the fractional-order Chua's system, " Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 140-147, 2008. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2006.10.054
|
[2] |
X. Gao and J. Yu, "Chaos in the fractional order periodically forced complex Duffing's oscillators, " Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 1097-1104, 2005. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2004.09.090
|
[3] |
K. Rabah, S. Ladaci, and M. Lashab, "Stabilization of Fractional Chen Chaotic System by Linear Feedback Control, " in Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Control, Eng. & Information Technology, CEIT' 2015, Tlemcen, Algeria. IEEE, 25-27, May 2015.
|
[4] |
W. H. Deng and C. P. Li, "Chaos synchronization of the fractional Lü system, " Physica A, vol. 353, no. 1, pp. 61-72, 2005. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/OAPaper/oai_doaj-articles_063fd84ed5be9d309335c6de6a06404f
|
[5] |
T. L. Lin and C. -H. Kuo, "Hinfty synchronization of uncertain fractional order chaotic systems: adaptive fuzzy approach, " ISA Trans., vol. 50, pp. 548-556, 2011. doi: 10.1016/j.isatra.2011.06.001
|
[6] |
K. Rabah, S. Ladaci, and M. Lashab, "State feedback with fractional PIlambdaDmu control structure for Genesio-Tesi Chaos stabilization, " in Proc. 15th IEEE Int. Conf. Sciences and Techniques of Autom. Control & Computer Eng., STA'2015, Monastir, Tunisia: IEEE, 21-23 December 2015, 328-333.
|
[7] |
S. Ladaci and A. Charef, "On fractional adaptive control, " Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 365-378, 2006. doi: 10.1007/s11071-006-0159-x
|
[8] |
S. Ladaci, J. J. Loiseau, and A. Charef, "Adaptive internal model control with fractional order parameter, " Int. J. Adaptive Control and Signal Processing, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 944-960, 2010. doi: 10.1002/acs.v24:11
|
[9] |
S. Ladaci and K. Khettab, "Fractional order multiple model adaptive control, " Int. J. Autom. & Syst. Eng., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 110-122, 2012. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/NSTLHY/NSTL_HYCC027636376/
|
[10] |
Y. Li, Y. -Q. Chen, and Y. Cao, "Fractional order universal adaptive stabilization, " in Proc. 3rd IFAC Workshop on Fractional Differentiation and Its Applications, Ankara, Turkey, November 2008, pp. 5-7.
|
[11] |
L. X. Wang, Adaptive Fuzzy Systems and Control: Design and Stability Analysis, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1994.
|
[12] |
L. X. Wang, "Stable adaptive fuzzy control of nonlinear systems, " IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 146-155, 1993. doi: 10.1109/91.227383
|
[13] |
K. Khettab, Y. Bensafia, and S. Ladaci, "Robust adaptive fuzzy control for a class of uncertain nonlinear fractional system, " in Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Electrical Eng. and Control Applications, Constantine, Algeria, November 2014.
|
[14] |
R. D. Nussbaum, "Some remarks on the conjecture in parameter adaptive control, " Syst. & Control Letters, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 243-246, 1983. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/016769118390021X
|
[15] |
X. D. Ye and J. P. Jiang, "Adaptive nonlinear design without a priori knowledge of control directions, " IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 43, no. 11, pp. 1617-1621, 1998. doi: 10.1109/9.728882
|
[16] |
J. C. Willems and C. I. Byrnes, "Global adaptive stabilization in the absence of information on the sign of the high frequency gain, " Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, Berlin, Springer-Verlag, vol. 62, pp. 49-57, 1984.
|
[17] |
B. Martesson, "Remarks on adaptive stabilization of first order nonlinear systems, " Syst. and Control Letters, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1-7, 1990. doi: 10.1016/0167-6911(90)90073-4
|
[18] |
Y. Zhang, C. Y. Wen, and Y. C. Soh, "Adaptive backstepping control design for systems with unknown high-frequency gain, " IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 45, no. 12, pp. 2350-2354, 2000. doi: 10.1109/9.895572
|
[19] |
Y. -J. Liu and Z. -F. Wang, "Adaptive fuzzy controller design of nonlinear systems with unknown gain sign, " Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 687-695, 2009. doi: 10.1007/s11071-009-9510-3
|
[20] |
A. Boulkroune and M. M'saad, "On the design of observer-based fuzzy adaptive controller for nonlinear systems with unknown control gain sign, " Fuzzy Sets and Syst., vol. 201, pp. 71-85, 2012. doi: 10.1016/j.fss.2011.12.005
|
[21] |
K. B. Oldham and J. Spanier, The Fractional Calculus. New York: Academic Press, 1974.
|
[22] |
K. Diethelm, N. J. Ford, and A. D. Freed, "A predictor-corrector approach for the numerical solution of fractional differential equations, " Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 29, no. 1-4, pp. 3-22, 2002. doi: 10.1023/A:1016592219341
|
[23] |
Y. Bensafia, S. Ladaci, and K. Khettab, "Using a fractionalized integrator for control performance enhancement, " Int. J. Innovative Computing, Information and Control, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 2013-2028, 2015. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=b88a1ff20752540c42eb290c6d500d6d
|
[24] |
R. Caponetto, G. Dongola, L. Fortina, and I. Petráš s, "Fractional order systems: modeling and control application, " World Scientific Series on Nonlinear Science, Series A, vol. 72, pp. 62-65, 2010. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zdhxb201411004
|
[25] |
E. Nechadi, M. N. Harmas, N. Essounbouli, and A. Hamzaoui, "Adaptive fuzzy sliding mode power system stabilizer using Nussbaum gain, " Int. J. Autom. Computing, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 281-287, 2013. doi: 10.1007/s11633-013-0722-0
|
[26] |
S. S. Ge, C. Yang, and T. H. Lee, "Adaptive robust control of a class of nonlinear strict-feedback discrete-time systems with unknown control directions, " Syst. & Control Letters, vol. 57, no. 11, pp. 888-895, 2008. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=f6035cdba163654102d1447f23a81921
|
[27] |
S. S. Ge and J. Wang, "Robust adaptive tracking for time-varying uncertain nonlinear systems with unknown control coefficients, " IEEE Trans. Automatic Control, vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 1463-1469, 2003. doi: 10.1109/TAC.2003.815049
|
[28] |
L. Li and Y. G. Sun, "Adaptive fuzzy control for nonlinear fractional-order uncertain systems with unknown uncertainties and external disturbance, " Entropy, vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 5580-5592, 2015. doi: 10.3390/e17085580
|
[29] |
T. T. Georgiou and M. C. Smith, "Robustness analysis of nonlinear feedback systems: an input-output approach, " IEEE Trans. Automatic Control, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 1200-1221, 1997. doi: 10.1109/9.623082
|
[30] |
T. C. Lin, C. H. Wang, and H. L. Liu, "Observer-based indirect adaptive fuzzy-neural tracking control for nonlinear SISO systems using VSS and Hinfty approaches, " Fuzzy Sets and Syst., vol. 143, pp. 211-232, 2004. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0114(03)00167-2
|
[31] |
N. Aguila-Camacho, M. A. Duarte-Mermoud, and J. A. Gallegos, "Lyapunov functions for fractional order systems, " Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 2951- 2957, 2014. doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2014.01.022
|
[32] |
M. A. Duarte-Mermoud, N. Aguila-Camacho, J. A. Gallegos, and R. Castro-Linares, "Using general quadratic Lyapunov functions to prove Lyapunov uniform stability for fractional order systems, " Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, vol. 22, no. 1-3, pp. 650-659, 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2014.10.008
|
[33] |
J. A. Gallegos, M. A. Duarte-Mermoud, N. Aguila-Camacho, and R. Castro-Linares, "On fractional extensions of Barbalat Lemma, " Syst. & Control Letters, vol. 84, pp. 7-12, Oct. 2015. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167691115001413
|
[34] |
C. L. Tsung and V. E. Balas, "Fractional order chaotic system tracking design based on adaptive hybrid intelligent control, " in Proc. the IEEE Int. Conf. Fuzzy Syst., Taipei, China, Jun. 2011.
|